For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires’ son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They’ve been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they’ll make it?

  • Almostarctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The 5 submariners chances of being rescued are very slim at this point but much much higher than the 500 migrants still missing off the coast of Greece who took to the waters not for a joy ride but to escape war and seek a better life.

    • MashingBundle@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, it’s confirmed. Honestly so grateful they had an immediate and painless death. Imagine sitting in complete darkness for 4 days waiting to suffocate.

  • Double_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Chances are high that that submarine just imploded in a millisecond and they just instantly died. Why else would it stop sending pings and completely dissappear otherwise?

    • Willer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I cant speak for myself but i think communication in general is a very well understood topic. If that fails you can just assume everyone is dead. I am not sure if the banging is real tho or if it was something else

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Power failure is my guess too, then they would have just drifted down to the bottom and froze to death in a few hours. Terrible way to die.

  • sternail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you mean imploding? Because if they didn’t implode, being stuck in a sub for days, slowly waiting to suffocate, ist fucking horrible.

    • Kainsley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thats my worst nightmare! Their toilet is just a tiny bottle so they’re all gonna be pissing, shitting and puking on each other for days, arguing everytime someone starts hyperventilating. fuck that.

      • sternail@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it sucks so much, it really can’t get much worse. Imagine after probably 36h of absolute terror, you finally fall asleep for a while. You dream about something nice, only to wake up again in this tube of desolation, realizing that you reached your final destination.

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Folks, the Titan submersible is a capsule that travelers are sealed into ** from the outside.** The passengers could be adrift on the surface, the air could run out, and they could theoretically suffocate on the surface. It’s locked with bolts from the outside. Yeah, the 96 hours of oxygen could be stretched if the passengers conserved their oxygen. That is, if they are not a part of the debris field that was located near the Titanic. Each passing minute now is increasingly likely to change this from rescue to recovery.

  • Faresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a bit confused that this is receiving so much attention. What’s so special about this case compared to all the other cases of people being lost at sea every year, besides them being rich?

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, this case is somewhat extraordinary, in a deeply disturbing way.

      First there was this amazing quote from the CEO who is missing on the craft right now

      “You know, at some point, safety is just pure waste,” Rush told CBS’ David Pogue during an episode of his “Unsung Science” podcast. “I mean, if you just want to be safe, don’t get out of bed, don’t get in your car, don’t do anything. At some point, you’re going to take some risk, and it really is a risk-reward question.”

      Second, aside from being made from questionable experimental materials, the sub was being controlled by an old, off brand xbox controller. There were numerous design and safety issues that were known at the time of departure. They kinda just did whatever in the F they wanted to. It’s a millionaire game of Fuck Around and Find Out and they’re not used to finding out.

      Third, the damage waiver

      The disclaimer, read out by CBS correspondent David Pogue, read: “This experimental submersible vessel has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body, and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma, or death.”

      A nervous-looking Pogue makes a face and says, “Where do I sign?” in the footage recorded when he went on the $250,000 (£195,000) trip to see the Titanic at the end of last year.

      I get that it’s just some rich idiots (and one of their kids) crossing the river styx, but it’s not very often you see such amazing disregard for basic safety.

      • Cynosure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t get why the Logitech controller is so focused on. I get that it’s probably not the right controller due to it’s age and wireless only nature but COTS parts are often more reliable than in-house ones. The lack of certification as you mentioned is a much larger issue.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any game controller, would be insufficient to put 5 peoples lives in danger.

          If you were going to use a game controller to do so anyway, you’d use one that can be easily replaced, maybe something manufactured in the past decade. That F710 is old (2011) and honestly didn’t rate all that well compared to other controllers of it’s time. It’s wireless, adding needless risk.

          The certification is all part of it. The control systems need to have backups. The gamepad aspect is interesting because it’s blatantly spitting in the face of safety which seemed to be the CEO’s style anyway.

          Would it have been better than a new xbox controller? I’m not sure, perhaps not if it the new one was at least wired.

            • zeppo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wouldn’t trust that controller for a dungeon run in the Elder Scrolls Online and here’s this dude visiting the Titanic in person with one. They did say he has backups on board, though.

          • Otakeb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I work on robotics and drones for the military and we use game controllers for teleoperation all the time. There are some times we use more rugged and robust controllers, but they are essentially just expensive, yellow Playstation controllers with e-stop buttons on the bottom (look up Fort robotics controller).

            I think you’d be surprised at how often the military uses game controllers for mission critical tech. The convergent design of game controllers has kind of solved the problem of minimal, handheld, input-output machines that are capable of commanding difficult procedures.

            • Dexies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you think it’s fun killing people and pretending it’s a video game?

              • Otakeb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t operate anything in the field but I design and build the stuff. Fortunately, I haven’t had to build any weapon systems or combat vehicles yet because I also have some moral apprehension to that as well, but I try not to shame those who do work on that stuff if I can avoid it. It’s a pretty standard meme that wide-eyed aerospace engineers with dreams of space travel get stuck designing missiles to pay the bills. I’m sure there’s not that many engineers in weapons tech that wouldn’t switch to rockets or self driving cars in a heartbeat if they could afford to and had an in.

                • Dexies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hey I appreciate the honest response. I was being a bit of a dick and I feel bad now. Peace.

    • Double_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It being so completely ridiculous. If a boat sinks, it just sinks… bad luck.

      But this was some crazy person using some jerry-rigged submarine and then rich people actually trusting that.

    • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me, it’s because this situation is a nightmare situation. I can’t think of many more aweful ways to go. There is a chance that right now people are dying in a tube at the bottom of the ocean. Slowly. Or even worse, they could be on the surface. Able to see out their window but suffocating to death just hoping to see a ship come by. Maybe they saw a ship and it passed by. Maybe they died instantly is a rapid collapse.

      I dunno, it’s just the epitome of horror. I keep finding myself thinking about possibilities and what it’s be like and what I’d do.

    • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      More mysterious. Spookier. Generally more novel. Like you said, people get lost at sea all the time. People rarely get lost thousands of miles below sea.

      • Ben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, it’s only 4km. If they weren’t lazy billionaires, they’d get out and walk home.

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One thing I can say is if they ever do find the sub intact, its very likely these guys recorded their last hours on their phones and we are very likely to see that at some point… talk about nightmare fuel.

      • Raakis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        thousands of miles below sea.

        No wonder they can’t be found—they have sunk to the fucking core of the planet :'D

        • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Haha oops, I am dumb. I apparently have no concept of the scale of the earth. I read an infographic and read meters as kilometers which is then head converted to miles. Off by quite a magnitude.

    • barfplanet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s mostly the being rich thing.

      It’s really sad that something like this gets so much news coverage and international support, while poor people are facing similar fates and we all pretend it’s not happening.

      I understand the news coverage. These are folks who are relatable to a lot of western audiences. People aspire to their wealth. The international support and rescue efforts though are a little shameful. You don’t see this kind of efforts when it’s migrants fleeing war and oppression.

      I see the attention on the war in Ukraine similarly. What Russia is doing is shameful and I’m glad Ukraine is getting so much help. At the same time Yemen has it much worse. Hardly anyone even knows there is a war happening there, but it’s American built bombs that are dropping on neighborhoods. They’re not quite white and relatable enough to get us all putting their flag on our Twitter profiles.

    • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Greece tragedy is lacking the irony and hubris of this.

      I mean, it’s a tourist submersible that was aiming to bring billionaires to view the Titanic wreckage and it likely got wrecked itself. And they named the submersible Titan.

      The sub’s company OceanGate was dinged by a former employee for all sorts of safety issues and they fired and sued him. There are also lots of choice quotes from the CEO (who happens to be on the vessel) about moving fast and breaking things, and regulations stifling innovation. So there’s some possible karma involved.

    • Gxost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s because the story about a missing submersible is unusual, and moreover, it’s about a rescue attempt. This makes it more interesting than many other, albeit more dreadful, news stories.

      • duringoverflow@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        sure. It has nothing to do with the fact that in one of cases they are 5 billionaires while in the other one they are 750 poor migrants. No, totally not.

        • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not entirely no, I didn’t see any news outlet leading the story with “5 Billionaires missing after Submersible lost contact”. For quite some time we didn’t even know who was on board. It’s more the fact that boats in the Mediterranean sink all the time, it’s still tragic but we know that that’s an issue we have now (most people unfortunately seem to have decided that they do not care that much). A submersible going missing and the coast guards of 2 countries looking for them, while thei only have air for a couple days, no one knowing where they are and it involving the titanic guarantees clicks, it’s almost like a movie plot. The fact that they are wealthy is certainly not the reason for it though, it’s the circumstances surrounding it, it’s unusual. People also know how ships work and why they capsize, while most people don’t have the slightest idea how deep sea submersibles work.

          So yes, the ship capsizing and killing that many people is horrible and should get more attention, especially from the Goverments involved. It’s ridiculous that we let those poor people drown by the thousands and treat the ones who made it like scum. But I’m not convinced the Titanic story got traction BECAUSE the victims have money.

          • penguin_knight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            really? The first point of information I found out was that it cost 250k to get on.

            "hey did you hear about the submarine that’s lost?

            “no?”

            “It cost 250k to get on, to go see the titanic wreck”

            pretty much how my entire day went yesterday with various coworkers

          • ivanafterall@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree with you, mostly, but you could also argue that the situation only exists/is only possible because they’re wealthy (the same reason the only sub apparently capable of rescuing them is owned by another billionaire). But that doesn’t diminish your point–were these somehow 5 poor people stuck at the bottom of the ocean in a sub near the Titanic, it would still probably get a lot of attention.

        • thekernel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Thailand cave rescue was all over the news and they were poor.

          Its about novelty, nothing more nothing less.

          A bunch of rich ppl have died on Mt Everest this year, nobody gives a shit as its a common occurrence.

      • vegivamp@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        750 people drowning is also unusual, and there’s also been rescue attempts.

        All these victims have loved ones, and i don’t wish death on anyone, but for the billionaires I find it quite hard to care much.

        I still hope they’re saved, though; and if they are I very much hope the experience will have changed them.

        • Kantiberl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s just not the same. Drowning is quick and if you don’t save them immediately they’re most likely dead. Slowly suffocating in a sub while the clock ticks and something can be done about it is a different story.

          Learn to care.

          • vegivamp@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re assuming they’re suffocating, when the smallest fault in the hull’s integrity would make the thing implode, killing them before they realized what was happening.

            Like everyone, my ability to care has limits. You can’t worry and care about everything. I’ll give my fucks for those who didn’t grow rich exploiting others, thanks.

    • Airazz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People tend to care more about the stuff that happens closer to them, or is somehow related to them. You probably don’t care all that much about the armed conflict in Mali between the government, ISIS and Wagner Group.

      • duringoverflow@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        if you live in europe, the Mediterranean sea is you know, right next to you. And way much closer than the distance of the titanic to the shore in America, which is about 1000 nautical miles.

        • Airazz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know anything about Mali, which is closer to to me than Titanic, but I do know a lot about the Titanic.

    • JeffCraig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I’m more upset about.

      Who gives a shit about a couple of billionaires. Why does this have to be a world-wide news story? Why don’t we care about the 100s of refugees that die all the time in maritime accidents and why are those things dominating the news?

      Time and time again we give the rich people all of our attention. Fuck that. We shouldn’t be letting the media direct our attention like this.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree, but missing sub is an unusual phenomenon and mystery that gets people interested.

      I don’t think the billionaires part is all that important, I didn’t know about it until today. The Kursk, the kids trapped in a cave, the miners that have spent months in a mine, those were all news too.

      But yea immigrants from war-torn regions - nobody cares unless they have “blond hair and blue eyes”.

  • Noedel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It really depends on how they went. Sudden implosion of the hull, quick and easy.

    Floating around for days until your air runs out, wondering if someone will find you… Not so much.

        • TheYang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          depends if they can get rid of the carbon dioxide.
          if there’s a constant low carbon dioxide atmosphere in the sub, they’ll suffocate peacefully, as humans can’t detect lack of oxygen, just too much carbon dioxide.

          That’s why you go moronic in a decompression in an airplane, body doesn’t get enough oxygen, but can get rid of the carbon dioxide, and you don’t notice you’re suffocating

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The sub will never be found is my guess too… its a huge ocean and with no beacon, its just another lump.