• mashbooq
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like it’s an underappreciated point that Christians have never followed Jesus; they follow Paul. “Christian” has always been a marketing term for an imperialist, non-Jewish (and in fact, anti-Jewish) religion that took over the momentum of a small Jewish sect that died out once it became clear Jesus wasn’t coming back.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Point of order; it took a few centuries to really get the anti-Jewish swing in progress. If it had been in full swing earlier on, there’d be no old testament.

      The fact that Paul was a Jewish Gnostic is just - bonus.

      • Thrashy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        After leaving the church, I’ve always found Saul/Paul’s conversion story a bit suspect. So you mean to tell me that you’re just out on the road one day, going from town to town persecuting Jesus-cultists, and a beam of light from heaven strikes you and tell you that what you actually need to do is join the Jesus-cultists, but spend the rest of your life assiduously walking back every radical thing they believe? Suuuure. I think maybe ol’ Saul just saw a movement with a power vacuum at the top and thought he should be one to fill it.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well the character “Jesus” is so clearly a continuation / rewrite of solar deity characters I think Paul must have had some task to “sell” it, but who/why/how I can’t speculate.

      • mashbooq
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are you implying that Christians are responsible for the preservation of the book they culturally appropriated?