HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 months agotitlehexbear.netimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down10
arrow-up1146arrow-down1imagetitlehexbear.netHarryLime [any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-27 months agoI don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·7 months agoWhat if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·7 months agothen start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
minus-squarelemmy_99c4zb3e3@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-27 months agoಠ_ಠ more optimal
I don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
ಠ_ಠ more optimal