The president has been going after his presumptive 2024 opponent with a little more venom than usual

Joe Biden is taking it to Donald Trump.

The president’s campaign responded to Trump’s wild press conference in New York on Monday by slamming the former president as “weak and desperate — both as a man and a candidate for President.”

“He spent the weekend golfing, the morning comparing himself to Jesus, and the afternoon lying about having money he definitely doesn’t have,” the statement read, adding that “America deserves better than a feeble, confused, and tired Donald Trump.”

  • dharwin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “weak and desperate — both as a man and a candidate for President.”

    “man” is quite generous.

  • joekar1990@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’d love to have campaign ads with trump talking about how much Obama golfed while in office and then compare it to how much trump golfed.

    • ElmarsonTheThird@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wasn’t there also something that Obama almost exclusively golfed at Andrews Base, a secure location near D.C. while the other guy had to go to his own club where the Secret Service had to book rooms in Trumps own hotel?

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nah, use the Trump sound bites and show headlines and videos of Trump doing the thing he’s complaining about.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    Time to take off the kid gloves. Part of the problem is that the Democrats have never really fought hard against the far right, the way they, for instance, fight against any progressive candidate that might rock the boat. They’d rather hand the country to the fascists than upset their sponsors.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unlike Trump I think our law and order has enough crime already. Could it really handle more? It’s already judge Dredd out there if you live in the wrong area.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “He spent the weekend golfing, the morning comparing himself to Jesus, and the afternoon lying about having money he definitely doesn’t have,” the statement read, adding that “America deserves better than a feeble, confused, and tired Donald Trump.”

    Trump spoke to the media in New York amid a very busy day for the former president’s legal docket.

    His comments came after a hearing in which Judge Juan Merchan rejected Trump’s bid to delay his criminal hush-money trial, setting it for April 15.

    Trump was livid at the ruling, accusing Merchan of participating in a Democratic conspiracy to keep him from reclaiming the White House.

    Trump has been whining incessantly about the civil fraud case on Truth Social, and ahead of the appeals court’s ruling, shared a message he said he received Monday morning comparing his plight to the persecution of Jesus Christ.

    He made a few gaffes as he ranted, confusing the election and his trial and promising to “bring crime back to law and order.” Trump also said he didn’t see much of a problem with having foreign governments help him pay for his bond despite his candidacy for president.


    The original article contains 395 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 52%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 months ago

      and promising to “bring crime back to law and order.”

      Cops: “Jokes on him, we’ve already got that covered!”

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        and promising to “bring crime back to law and order."

        Oops, accidentally said something true there.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    252
    ·
    8 months ago

    “America deserves better than a feeble, confused, and tired Donald Trump.”

    Definitely true.

    But America also deserves someone better than Biden.

    We have two shit tier options, and no matter who wins, America loses.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      232
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Cut the both-sides shit. Trump is a convicted sex criminal and fraud who wants to end democracy. There is objectively a better choice between the two.

      • Lost_Faith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        the only valid both sides is they are both way too old for the job. 1 old guy will give you the chance to vote for someone else in 4 years, the other will not. 1 guy has a record, tho spotty, looking out for your middle class, the other …

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Biden is good, he’s just not great. To get someone better you need democracy and there’s a high chance we will lose that under Trump.

      • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        The comment seems more intended to push voters away from Biden and toward an RFK option than convincing anyone to vote for Trump. It’s stupid and easy to attack back, but we also need to be careful about what the strategy is.

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            This is the problem when there is no nuance to discussion or understanding. Everyone should vote for Biden—that doesn’t mean it’s great that we have two octogenarians duking it out in a “no YOURE more senile!” fight. And that’s before you get into the whole, y’know, participating in genocide thing.

            Biden is a terrible choice to have to make…but we all have to make it.

            • Nudding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think if those are your choices, you don’t deserve to be a country.

              If you ever find yourself supporting genocide in order to “save yourselves” from a worse candidate, you should stop and look at the system you’re choosing to engage with.

              Sometimes the system needs to be rebuilt.

              • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                The country is genocidal. The money behind and propping up the country are genocidal. The massive machinery that is favors, power, exploitation, state violence, and spying IS modern life under capitalism. Voting won’t change that.

                But. It will change how trans people are treated, how vicious we are to the poor, how destructive we are of what little environment we have left, how much we wield that unbelievable power and might to punish…whoever.

                Yeah, it’s a shitty decision. None of us are happy about it. None of us want this. But there is a worse option. Things aren’t so straightforward. Modern life means every dollar/euro/peso/whatever you spend is hurting someone for profit. “If those are your choices, you don’t deserve to be a person.” There is no ethical consumption under capitalism. There is no ethical vote to cast in a superpower. There is no ethical action in modern life because the system that put that option in front of you is built on exploitation. What’s the answer? Kill yourself? Think.

                • Nudding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t know the answer. Nobody does. It’s a personal question. I’m glad you’re asking yourself and thinking about it. That’s my goal.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        48
        ·
        8 months ago

        Trump isnt a convicted sex criminal… and the other guy has some serious sexual allegations too, outside of being creepy around kids

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          8 months ago

          He was found liable for sexual abuse in NY civil court and fined $5 million for it.

          https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/e-jean-carroll-trump-lawsuit-battery-defamation-verdict/index.html

          The judge made it very clear Trump is a rapist, saying:

          “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

          Biden has never been charged in civil or criminal court for any sexual impropriety. It is simply a lie that there are any serious sexual allegations against him.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            8 months ago

            He was not convicted of rape.

            And if you compare what biden allegedly did to what trump allegedly did, Bidens accusation seems much more accurate. It actually had colloborating evidence at the time, vs no evidence against trump.

            • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              The judge in the case said Trump was convicted of rape. There are no credible accusations against Biden. You are repeating lies.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                Please tell me one of the juror names in the trump rape conviction.

                Why dont you believe women when they claim they are raped?

                • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The jurors are anonymous as is common in trials where the defendant has a history of calling for violence against people he views as his enemies.

                  I believe women who take their rapists to court.

                • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  No thank you. I don’t like to engage too much with people who can’t be bothered to proof-read their own posts.

                  Nor do I enjoy discussions with people who are so assured of their own self-righteousness that they ignore documented facts in lieu of their own personal opinions.

                  It just so happens that I also don’t much enjoy arguing with people who have a documented public history of arguing in bad faith.

      • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        158
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not both-sides to say that Genocide Joe sucks ass. Yes, Trump is worse. But Biden is still awful. I don’t say that in some effort to appease the right or sound somehow neutral, I say it because it’s true.

        • IonAddis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          106
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nah, you say it to sap unity and make people stay home from voting.

          Your vibe is the same as the girls who say they bluntly “tell it as they see it” in their dating profile, but anyone with any relationship experience knows that means they’re completely willing to make things toxic as fuck because they’ll just vomit their selfish so called truth anywhere without caring about consequences or how it destroys, because it serves some sort of other motivation for them.

          Using words to encourage people to embrace hopelessness and not vote is a propaganda technique to put Trump back in the Whitehouse, and him being there weakens the nation so immensely and catastrophically that it’s extremely attractive to cash and weapons poor enemies to plop someone in front of a cheap computer to spread propaganda to attempt to destroy a nation from within. People who can’t fight the US with military might will use words instead.

          In short, your words are not neutral. You’re either what is called a useful idiot, an ordinary person who swallowed outside propaganda whole and does the work of other interests here, or you’re a knowing perpetrator.

          I hope people here use whatever skills they picked up in English class however many years ago to think about not just the exact words of the poster I’m responding to, but why they posted this thing at this moment, their motivations beyond what they claim they are, and the effects of an appeal to truth on a reader and how that can influence perception even when the thing said isn’t actually necessarily true or contains such a small flake of some truth that it is effectively turns into a lie when put beside the bigger and more vast and complicated truths.

          • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            56
            ·
            8 months ago

            People shouldn’t stay home on election day just because Biden is a terrible piece of shit. People should go at the very least to vote down ballot, if not to vote against Trump. Nor should people feel hopeless. There are so many avenues to pursue outside of simple electoral politics (again, do vote). But I’m not going to cave to this loyalty test bullshit. Also the money is good, praise Mother Russia.

            In short, your words are not neutral.

            Yes. That is literally what I said.

            Look, I agree that “telling it like it is” can be a toxic trait (although as long as we’re discussing the subtext, it’s interesting that you used the example of “girls”. I’m sure you didn’t mean to, I’m not leveling accusations at you, we all do this to some degree or another, but that is definitely an appeal to misogyny. You could have compared me to Bill Maher, which frankly would have pissed me off a whole lot more). But the truth does matter, and appeals to nuance/arguing procedural or rhetorical points while ignoring the realities is also toxic. Children in Gaza are dying, and Biden has actively helped with that. Call it propaganda, call it whatever you want, but innocent people are dead, as a result of a genocidal campaign helped by Biden.

            • Manos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Those stats go back 35 years. He’s maybe the only person that’s been in office that long, of course he’s going to accumulate the most.

              • WraithGear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                8 months ago

                That’s not really a knock against his statement. That he has gotten a lot from Israel for a long time, and so may feel beholden to them.

                I am also getting absolute sick of all of the people who are jumping down the throats of people who express weariness at Joe Biden being the democratic nominee. Like ffs, he is in no way representing my interests and is another step tword the right. It may be slower then the full on sprint of the Republican Party, but my ONLY input into this process is my vote. In the primaries i sure as shit did not vote for joe, and anyone refusing to vote because of the bull shit he’s pulled is justified.

                Instead of blaming the disenfranchised you and the Democrats should find a better politician and better politics

                • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  LOL Trump is telling Israel to hurry up (aka genocide harder). The nickname isn’t really appropriate for Biden given the global context.

        • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          62
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          “no matter who wins, America loses”

          That sounds like both-sides to me. Biden has done some objectively great things for Americans even with a senate fighting him for the first 2 years and a Congress for the last 2

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I can definitely point to more good things Biden has done in his term than Trump did in his. Plus there’s the mountain of Trump’s crimes to compare with the non-mountain of non-crimes on Biden’s side. Of course, I’m not a fan of Biden’s authoritarian tendencies, but again Trump is far worse in that area.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ah yes, someone who enables genocide by continuing existing funding practices is totally deserving of that specific nickname while the other guy who has repeatedly said he would literally do what Israel is doing and that Israel should ‘finish the job’ doesn’t get a pithy nickname.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The cosplayers will always write “Genocide Joe” and will always fail to note that Donald is intentionally referencing the “Final Solution” from the Nazis.

          • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t know what you’re on about… They’re obviously and completely unbiased, and anyone who says otherwise will also get a pithy nickname

            /s for anyone who needed it

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Dude, your choice is between an insurrectionist fraud who is almost certainly a Russian asset and a moderate.

      While Biden may not be the perfect candidate, the choice of who to vote for isn’t difficult.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        83
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, but I’m in of the more than 50% of states Biden has zero chance of winning.

        The only time my state has went D in recent history was when a young progressive outsider won the Dem primary. And in the 16 years since the DNC has taken a lot of steps to ensure that never happens again.

        Most recently taking NH’s delegates away.

        If the DNC wants to win my state, they’re going to have to stop running neoliberals, regardless of how I personally vote.

        But the DNC doesn’t want to win if it means a progressive candidate.

        So you can blame one random voter for having morals, or you can blame the DNC for not giving voters what they want for easy wins.

        What do you think is more productive?

        • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          63
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ah, so your answer is to bitch and moan about both candidates until election day which you won’t even be participating in. Got it.

        • IonAddis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          People reading along here should note this person is trying to turn blue states purple, they admit it with their own words, and they are appealing to morality to lure suckers in.

          As if nobody but them is a moral person

          Bullshit.

          But a lot of us have religious triggers planted deep, yeah? That if you toddle along with the person claiming they are of virtue, maybe you’ll be a good person too?

          Anyway.

          Vote like your hair is on fire, because if assholes like this fine upstanding “moral” person has their say and causes blue voters to stay home, we’re gonna be fucked, just as we were before. They’re trying the same tactic that worked before even to give us Trump. And why wouldn’t they? It worked.

          No state is “safe” from flipping.

          Also note that playing with voting demographics is why a lot of the anti-abortion laws are being pushed…to cleanse purple states of blue voters by driving them out. So when you see anyone encouraging you not to vote because a state is safe, understand it’s part of an effort to flip states from blue or purple to red.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            36
            ·
            8 months ago

            this person is trying to turn blue states purple

            In the last 60 years, my state has voted for Dems twice…

            To get it up to three, you have to go back 90 years, that’s longer than Biden has been alive, barely

            • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              33
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              “not enough people in my state vote D and that’s a bad thing”

              “I’ll never vote for a Democrat in my state unless they’re perfect and that’s a good thing”

              Okay then.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            44
            ·
            8 months ago

            Man, you remember when only Republicans made fun of people for having morals and not just blinding voting for your team?

            It wasn’t that long ago…

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Remember when Republicans cared about anyone other than the wealthy and their own self interests at the expense of literally everyone else?

              I don’t.

            • StinkyOnions@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              Whether you vote for Biden or not, you’re still voting for Genocide. Inaction is a decision. So, you’re not as morally superior as you think you are.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                35
                ·
                8 months ago

                Mate, I’m one vote, not half a million.

                Biden has absolutely 0% chance of winning my state.

                I’m not in one of the three states that got Biden into office on 30k votes.

                Hell, my state hasn’t even held it’s primary yet.

                The DNC doesn’t give a single fuck about my state. I’m not an abused spouse, I’m not going to keep supporting Biden for zero reason.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          So you can blame one random voter for having morals, or you can blame the DNC for not giving voters what they want for easy wins.

          i can blame both simultaneously

          if we end up with a fascist president, it is both

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            39
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ok man, if Biden loses my state by one vote and trump becomes president you can 100% blame me…

            Last time he lost my state by about half a million tho, so I think I’m safe…

            • chingadera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Read what happened during bush v gore. Your vote matters, you can spare the 15min-4 hours depending on location once every 2-4 years. Sure it’s a shit show, but you’re actively letting the shit show get shittier by trying to prove a point to the DNC, which you eluded to not giving a fuck what you think.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Oh I’m still voting. Haven’t missed an election since I turned 18.

                Downballot races matter. Not just House/Senate, but local and judges.

                But I’m not throwing my morals in the trashcan to vote Biden when he has zero chance of winning.mybstate anyways. I’ve blindly voted straight ticket for decades. I can’t keep doing it. For president I’m probably going to leave it blank or write in.

                Because I’ve seen what happens when Democrats no longer try for anyone’s votes except Republicans.

                If they think anyone left of republicans are obligated to vote “blue no matter who” them they’ll never change.

                As long as progressives vote for neoliberals, we’ll never get anything. The DNC only responds to bullshit like this, so this is the only chance at getting the DNC to listen to voters.

                • chingadera@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  There is an immediate grave danger to everyone you know and more that you don’t. Sometimes you have to figure that into your moral compass as well. Think of it like stealing bread to feed your family. It looks like you’ve put a lot of thought into this decision, and I hope you continue to.

    • SmurfNuts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Look, let’s get this out of the way. I’m not a Democrat. Didn’t vote for Biden or Trump at any point. Yet comparing them one is clearly capable and one is not. How does that make them equal? That’s delusional thinking.

      Do I want a better candidate than either of them? Sure, but it’s not going to happen this election cycle. And yes it’s fucked these are the only choices we get.

      Yet which one is really likely to fuck us over? The answer to that isn’t Biden. Not by a longshot.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        The problem with this is that we have history with both of them, and we can see what they did. I am not going to vote for either of them, but biden has been objectively an incompetent president, probably the worst president in the modern era outside of Bush.

        • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          so between eating a shit sandwich or being driven off a cliff and potentially dying, you’d chose death? honestly the dumbest take I’ve heard in a while. thanks for the laugh, I guess 🤡

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You can claim what you wish, but the current president is the one that got us invovled in two wars that lead directly to WW3. Just because you guys got TDS doesnt meant the delusions are true.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        8 months ago

        How does that make them equal?

        No one said it was.

        If you can vote for a president who not only went around Congress to fund a genocide, but also went around Congress to prevent aid to the victims…

        That’s your decision that you will have to live with

        Maybe that’s not a big deal for you. Maybe it’s harder on me because I’m a third generation disabled veteran.

        But everyone has a line. I truly help the DNC gets better before your line is crossed.

        • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I hope you do understand that Trump isn’t any better in this regard - he isn’t just going to continue funding Israel like Biden currently is, he’s already expressed his full support of Netanyahu’s genocidal actions and will seek to help him further.

          You can choose not to vote, but understand that if enough people come in with that same attitude, Trump will win, because his supporters don’t care what his policies on Israel are, they just want him to win.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            his supporters don’t care what his policies on Israel are, they just want him to win.

            supporters of trump and biden have so much in common!

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            What’s the point of not replying to one comment, scrolling down, and trying to start a new chain with the same person?

            Like, I’ve explained everything you’re asking about multiple times already… If you can’t understand it, maybe it’s because you’re jumping around this thread and replying randomly to different comments?

            I just don’t see the point, unless you’re intentionally just trying to waste people’s time.

            I know understanding complicated political issues is hard, and I 100% understand if you just give up. But don’t go to the same thread and reply to the same person to have the same conversation you gave up on.

            • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              What’s the point of not replying to one comment, scrolling down, and trying to start a new chain with the same person?

              Mostly because other people already have echoed the exact same sentiment I would have, and I figured it wasn’t worth chiming in. However, as nobody has bothered to reply to you here, I thought I would.

              Having said that, if you really want my view, I’ll give it to you…

              Like, I’ve explained everything you’re asking about multiple times already… If you can’t understand it, maybe it’s because you’re jumping around this thread and replying randomly to different comments?

              What you explained is that you’re in a state Biden is likely to lose, and that to have any chance of him winning you think the DNC would need a much more progressive candidate. That’s a valid viewpoint…

              However, refusing to vote in protest because of that is just plain stupid. For all intents and purposes, it’s a two party system, so refusing to vote for one party helps the other party - which in this case is Trump.

              And as far as your question goes, they’re not mutually exclusive. I can blame the DNC shifting slowly closer and closer right in order to appeal to moderates whilst also blaming all of the protesters who think they’re just one person, who think their refusal won’t affect anything because everyone else will vote anyway - you act morally righteous when in reality all your protesting is doing is helping those who’d do far worse.

              And that brings me to what you haven’t explained, at least not to me - how can you refuse to vote Biden because of him continuing funding towards Israel whilst knowing that the person your protest would enable doesn’t just want to continue the very same funding, but also openly supports Netanyahu in his genocide!

              You’re either acting as a useful idiot cutting your nose off to spite your face, or knowingly trying to disenframchise the people who would vote for Biden. Neither is a good look really.

              I know understanding complicated political issues is hard, and I 100% understand if you just give up. But don’t go to the same thread and reply to the same person to have the same conversation you gave up on.

              You make it out like you’ve got a galactic brain, 1000 IQ, incomprehensible opinion when in reality it comes down to either you vote for the future of democracy, or you do nothing and doom it whilst moaning that we should’ve all done better.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                when in reality it comes down to either you vote for the future of democracy,

                If NH had primary delegates, I’d believe you.

                But only state republicans can change the law that NH goes first. So if you’re worried about the future of democracy, you might want to pay more attention to who you’re voting for.

                Because it’s looking like the DNC won’t let NH have a say anytime soon, and I seriously doubt they’ll be the only ones.

                Hell, half the states haven’t even voted in a primary before people start calling it over.

                The system doesn’t work, and it hasn’t for a long time.

                If everyone always votes D no matter what, shit will keep getting worse. There has to be standards

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              if you don’t like seeing their responses, you can use your privacy settings.

    • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      How do you have so much time to spend on this website trying to convince people not to vote? How does someone so passionately stand for absolutely nothing? I’ve seen these same posts from you over and over and over again, yet you never actually have anything to say besides ‘both sides bad, don’t vote.’

      If you have a better option, I’d love to hear it. But if not, maybe shut the fuck up and quit turfing for Trump.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Maybe I’m just old enough to realize the last 30 years of DNC strategy has been completely devoid of logic, and just results in the Dem party getting more and more conservative every cycle.

        Maybe I’ve realized that as long as progressives vote for the lesser of two evils, the DNC will only ever compromise for “moderates” who wants the party to be more conservative.

        I’ve spent 20 years voting D for president, only once did I get to vote for someone I liked at the time.

        Maybe nows the time to do the only thing the DNC cares about. Loudly refuse to vote for them until they give me what I want. Because that works with the DNC, they’re constantly saying they need to be more conservative to steal votes from Republicans, and that they don’t have to ever move left because there’s no better option.

        Because after 20 years, “voting blue no matter who” has only lead to a slow march of elderly conservative candidates who won’t push for the party platform even when they have the House and Senate.

        I used to say “the primary is the real election” but that’s not true anymore, the DNC just doesn’t give a fuck about the democratic base anymore.

        What’s your grand plan? Keep doing what we’ve been doing for decades and hope the result is magically different?

        • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Loudly refuse to vote for them until they give me what I want.

          Might be slightly more effective to draw a frowny face in poop on your front door to express your political discontent ;)

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve tried voting blue no matter who, and all it’s done is get me a front row seat to the destruction of the democratic party

            I’ve also noticed when anyone else draws a line in the sand, the DNC quickly caves.

            So maybe it’s time for progressives to draw a line. It’s the only thing I’ve ever seen work.

            What’s you’re recommendation?

            I used to say “vote in the primary” but that was before the DNC started canceling them for things only republicans can change.

            I’m honestly asking, what is your plan to stop the DNC from their decades long march to the right?

        • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          The end game of the lib’s “harm reduction” is to continue taking shots to the left 30 years from now when the presidential candidates are a choice between the dem who wants to do 5 genocides and the repub who wants to do 10 genocides. At that point, the metamorphosis from liberal to fascist will be complete. To the liberal mind, political analysis stops with the earth-shattering revelation that 5 < 10.

          They’ve been anchor biased hard as fuck, and they will continue to prop up genocide across the third world and beyond such that they never have to question their precious governmental systems and bureaucracy. The ecocidal, genocidal, imperialist political project that is the United States (which was devised a blink ago by 30-year old white slavers) is far more precious to liberals than, you know, halting genocide.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        8 months ago

        What a disgusting comment. Obviously they’re passionate about not supporting a genocide. Can you fucking read?

        • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Passionate about not supporting genocide, but is willing to let Trump back in the White House, thus propagating the genocide.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            8 months ago

            What do you want them to do, set themself on fire on the White House lawn? Not going to accomplish much.

        • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          ‘Not supporting a genocide’ is not a candidate running for election.

          Nobody here wants to support genocide. It’s not brave statement, it’s fucking common sense. But the options are ‘a guy who’s weakly attempting to deescalate things’ and ‘hurry up and finish your genocide already’. If you truly don’t want to support genocide, there’s a clear pick.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nobody here wants to support genocide.

            Yeah, but Biden and the unelected leaders of the DNC do, and they dont care what you want if you keep voting for them.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                For president?

                Probably a write in.

                For everyone down ballot race?

                Straight D for anyone who doesn’t take AIPAC money.

                Little more work, but worth it.

                If I keep voting straight D, it’s just letting the party be dragged to the right. At some point either the DNC finally listens, or everyone will hit their own line in their own time.

                If your only standard is a D next to name, maybe you’ll never have to worry aboutnthis.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Found the right wing. Or the Russian.

      The most important thing is NOT Trump. We can worry about that other thing like RANKED VOTING after that

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah totally agree. Biden is the least bad as an outsider, but he’s still a shit candidate and the fact the Democrats chose him shows how weak and poorly run they are as a party.

      Biden is the least bad option in a 2 man race but fundamentally US democracy is broken and rotten to its core.

      The fact polls show it neck and neck at this stage, given trumps legal woes and his attempt to overthrow the last election result, bodes very badly.