Real question. I would like to know what drives you to hate Apple? (In terms of privacy of course because in terms of price it’s another story).

  • @subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    413 days ago

    They can lie about how the advanced data encryption works…. But then they also tell you that you’re shit outta luck if you forget or screw up your decryption code. If they really had a back door, then I would expect them to take a much less hard line on you’re screwed if you lose the key.

    I would be surprised if they had a back door too given how they’ve pushed back on back doors from the NSA and EU

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ
      link
      -113 days ago

      I mean they understand their encryption algorithm, they made it after all, and with the advancements of Quantum computing it could be possible to decrypt someone’s data… So what good does providing quantum computing for Imessages do… If they : understand how the algorithm works + they have enough computing power to decrypt it + it’s proprietary.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if it was all a theater, and it’s the best backdoor implementation to exist

      • @subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        413 days ago

        This feels a lot like the argument of well what if they break TLS? A lot of hypotheticals when I don’t have any reason or proof to believe that they’ve made a back door

        • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ
          link
          113 days ago

          No, breaking an encryption is all about knowing how it works, many cryptographers make their algorithm proprietary in hopes that an attacker will have a hard time figuring how it works, however they turn out to be weak, other encryption algorithms are developed in the open so that many people look at it and see the flaws

          The key word is : weak The idea is not making a backdoor directly, the idea is making it flawed, it’s like securing a bank with steel doors with the exception of one door, that door is made out of wood and only you know where it’s located.