This article outlines an opinion that organizations either tried skills based hiring and reverted to degree required hiring because it was warranted, or they didn’t adapt their process in spite of executive vision.

Since this article is non industry specific, what are your observations or opinions of the technology sector? What about the general business sector?

Should first world employees of businesses be required to obtain degrees if they reasonably expect a business related job?

Do college experiences and academic rigor reveal higher achieving employees?

Is undergraduate education a minimum standard for a more enlightened society? Or a way to hold separation between classes of people and status?

Is a masters degree the new way to differentiate yourself where the undergrad degree was before?

Edit: multiple typos, I guess that’s proof that I should have done more college 😄

  • RedFoxOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Training people is expensive in both cash for the business and the time of those around them

    You’re definitely supported by an enormous amount of evidence in this.

    In my current job, we have a small group of employees with specialties in sciences, medical, hazardous materials, IT, threat/plume modeling, and running daily activities. They go to so much training in their first two years, they’re gone all the time, and then they are still almost worthless for another year due to lack of real-world knowledge they couldn’t get from these special schools.

    When we hire the wrong people, it’s a huge problem in costs, lost time, and then it makes finding replacements that much harder and shorts the organization longer as well.

    Finding the right people who are a good fit is hard.