• @postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            45 months ago

            In the example only the initial victim had a gun, presumably the ‘burliest of asailants’ was using physical strength as their weapon.

          • @aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            No it is not, you are saying two completely different things.

            Does having a pilots livense reduce your likelihood of dying in plane crash?

            Vs

            Does having a pilots license give you the ability to be responsible for your own safety in plane?

            Two completely different things

              • @aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                45 months ago

                having a gun to defend yourself from someone with a gun works

                No, it’s that it grants you the opportunity to defend yourself, not that you can.

                (more guns reducing gun crime)

                That is not what that means. Nowhere is that claimed. Maybe ask ChatGPT to rephrase it for you.

                  • @aidan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    25 months ago

                    You’re unable to come up with a response to my argument so you try to discredit me by claiming I used AI to write it?

                    Can you respond to something without a strawman?

                    That is not what I said. I told you to ask ChatGPT to rephrase the initial point for you. Y’know so you could understand it instead of strawmanning it.