• BraveSirZaphod
      link
      fedilink
      -87 months ago

      Well, you never saw an attack of this scale in the West Bank, where the IDF does have an extremely thorough presence. And you never saw this happen before the IDF withdrew from Gaza.

      So, yes, you have sarcastically arrived at a true solution. Well done.

        • @mwguy
          link
          English
          -37 months ago

          It’s amazing that people can see Apartheid and how it ended and never question Palestinian actions. Apartheid ended because there was a belief in a peaceful future. There’s no Mandela in Palestine that can convince the Israeli’s that giving up power would lead to peace. And after a 20 year experiment in self rule in Gaza failed; it’s hard to see the alternative.

          • AdeptusPrimaris
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Just fyi. Apartheid didn’t end because of peaceful protest.

            The ANC had been peacefully opposing the Apartheid government. But that all ended after the Sharpeville massacre commited by the Apartheid government.

            Then MK was formed ( uMkhonto we Sizwe). MK was the armed guerilla resistance that Mandela and the ANC saw was needed, because the Apartheid government wasn’t giving in to peaceful opposition of their government.

            You’re probably confusing what people say was a ‘peaceful’ end to Apartheid because civil war was avoided.

            And it was only truly avoided because the resistance had to make so many unfair concessions to the international liberal powers that be ( imf, the US etc.) and the Apartheid government. Otherwise the Apartheid government was gearing up to actually start mass murdering the non white population (aka genocide).

            There truly are a lot of parallels between Apartheid south africa and israel

              • AdeptusPrimaris
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Exactly. People don’t want to accept it but i see a lot of parallels between MK and Qassam brigades as liberation armed struggle. When peaceful protest fails then violent opposition is inevitable.

            • @mwguy
              link
              English
              -17 months ago

              The problem is that there’s no peaceful organization saying “yes two state solution” or “yes one integrated, non-religious state”.

              Weaker violence only works if there’s a weaker peaceful option.

                • @mwguy
                  link
                  English
                  07 months ago

                  I think you mean PLA.

                  And the PLA has rejected all 2 state solution offers, pays out a fund to the families of killed terrorists (including Hamas’ and is just as corrupt if not more corrupt than Hamas. Endorsed the 10/7 attacks. They’re not a potential partner for peace and have proven it over the last 40 years or so.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Like the other guy said, what ended Apartheid was the ANC’s violent resistance and international pressure.

            Also the “experiment” in Gaza failed because Israel has blockaded Gaza exactly as long as Gaza has had self-rule (both started in September 2005). The Gazan economy was dependent on using the income from agricultural exports to import food and other life necessities. Then Israel came and just said no you can’t do that.

            • @mwguy
              link
              English
              07 months ago

              Also the “experiment” in Gaza failed because Israel has blockaded Gaza

              The world’s largest ever suicide bombing campaign started that blockade. And two decades of indiscriminate rocket fire kept it going.

              The Iron Dome isn’t magic. It can only intercept so many projectiles. No blockade and Gaza is recoccuoied in 2008.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                And two decades of indiscriminate rocket fire kept it going.

                Then why wasn’t it lifted in 2008 or 2013? Israel signed ceasefires with Hamas then that stipulated the blockade would be lifted, and even though Hamas followed their end of the ceasefire it wasn’t lifted.

                Also, then what was the “experiment” you were talking about? Whether a strip of land dependent on foreign trade can survive when cut off from the outside world?

                • @mwguy
                  link
                  English
                  07 months ago

                  Because they kept firing rockets. 2008

                  During the initial week of the ceasefire, Islamic Jihad militants fired rockets on Israel. Under pressure from Hamas, Islamic Jihad had agreed to abide by the temporary truce, which was meant to apply only to Gaza, but had balked at the idea of not responding to Israeli military actions in the West Bank. The New York Times reported that the Islamic Jihad action broke the Hamas-Israeli Gaza truce.[3] During the next 5 months of the ceasefire, Gazan attacks decreased significantly for a total of 19 rocket and 18 mortar shell launchings,[3][4] compared to 1199 rockets and 1072 mortar shells in 2008 up to 19 June, a reduction of 98%.[5]

                  Pretty sure. A similar thing happened in 2013 too.

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness
                    link
                    fedilink
                    07 months ago

                    The ceasefire demanded that Hamas police other groups to prevent them from firing rockets. They did. Do you understand the numbers you’re reading? 19 rockets is basically a rounding error, and could’ve been reduced further had Israel actually followed its end of the deal.