@PoseidonsWake@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.worldEnglish • 7 months agoTux Machines — It's False: Those Are Not Alternatives to LibreOffice. They're Proprietary or Not Maintained.news.tuxmachines.orgmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1external-linkTux Machines — It's False: Those Are Not Alternatives to LibreOffice. They're Proprietary or Not Maintained.news.tuxmachines.org@PoseidonsWake@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.worldEnglish • 7 months agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
THE site “It’s FOSS” suggests alternatives to FOSS. At least half of those alternatives are NOT FOSS, so why bother? █
minus-square@QuiklinkEnglish13•7 months agoGenerally I agree with the sentiment of the article, although I don’t get why OnlyOffice is called proprietary, as it’s licensed under the AGPL as far as I know…
Generally I agree with the sentiment of the article, although I don’t get why OnlyOffice is called proprietary, as it’s licensed under the AGPL as far as I know…
it is agpl3, repos are https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/