PoseidonsWake@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator to Linux@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Tux Machines — It's False: Those Are Not Alternatives to LibreOffice. They're Proprietary or Not Maintained.news.tuxmachines.orgexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1external-linkTux Machines — It's False: Those Are Not Alternatives to LibreOffice. They're Proprietary or Not Maintained.news.tuxmachines.orgPoseidonsWake@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator to Linux@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square6linkfedilinkfile-text
THE site “It’s FOSS” suggests alternatives to FOSS. At least half of those alternatives are NOT FOSS, so why bother? █
minus-squareQuiklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 年前Generally I agree with the sentiment of the article, although I don’t get why OnlyOffice is called proprietary, as it’s licensed under the AGPL as far as I know…
minus-squareares35@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 年前it is agpl3, repos are https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/
Generally I agree with the sentiment of the article, although I don’t get why OnlyOffice is called proprietary, as it’s licensed under the AGPL as far as I know…
it is agpl3, repos are https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/