“If it involves money. It’ll be on our platform. Money or securities or whatever. So, it’s not just like send $20 to my friend. I’m talking about, like, you won’t need a bank account.”

Well that sounds terrifying!

  • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Somehow services like PayPal manage to avoid being regulated like a bank. I’m sure they’ll clobber cobble together some potentially unlawful solution and not face any repercussions for it.

      • harmonea@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Clobber” implies violence, which is somehow even less elegant than the standard phrase that the haphazard “cobble” implies. Given the shitshow of X so far, clobber probably works better even if it’s not the usual way to phrase this at all.

        • Bizarroland@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          And despite cobble and clobber implying violence and inelegance, cobblers are either some of the best versions of pies or the people that maintain your fanciest of shoes.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think because they’re a payment processor. Banks store large amounts of money, make loans, etc.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s going to be like a crypto or PayPal wallet where you can store a balance, it’s just not insured or regulated like a bank.

        I saw an article a while ago where a concerning amount of people were doing that instead of a bank account.