@fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoX sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisionsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1178arrow-down11cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.worldtwitter@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkX sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisionsarstechnica.com@fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.worldtwitter@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square@9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink66•10 months ago If Twitter has nothing to hide, then they should have no objection to this bill. Always nice to see the “nothing to hide, nothing to worry about” wielded at a big company rather than everyday people. Also extra points for the guy for calling it Twitter too
minus-squarePrior_IndustrylinkfedilinkEnglish40•10 months agoMusk was all about the Twitter files, so why so coy now?
Always nice to see the “nothing to hide, nothing to worry about” wielded at a big company rather than everyday people.
Also extra points for the guy for calling it Twitter too
Musk was all about the Twitter files, so why so coy now?
Rules for thee, not for me.
Because the X files was already taken