Pretty damning review.

  • @cyberic@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9211 months ago

    Their issues are:

    1. Bad data - major errors in review videos
    2. Ethical concerns - conflicts of interest, Billet review, Pwnage review
        • Magnor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4311 months ago

          At the very least it appears incredibly reckless.

        • King
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -6911 months ago

          Evil - least sheltered redditor, just an ass

          • @picassowary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4111 months ago

            ruining a prototype product, talking shit about it, and then selling it is a lot worse than being “just an ass”

            • King
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -8311 months ago

              K hes hitler the evil twins

                • King
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -4411 months ago

                  Ad hominems, buddy projecting find an argument next time

              • @picassowary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1811 months ago

                the dictionary definition of evil is “morally reprehensible”. you don’t need to overreact by going straight to a godwin

                • King
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -3311 months ago

                  So what we call hitler then

                  • -V0lD
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1611 months ago

                    Pink and crimson are both red. But vastly different shades of it

      • @SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3011 months ago

        I think that their point that it’s an $800 product for a last-gen card, there really isn’t anyone out there that should buy this, and therefore it’s a bad product is valid. They could have handled the whole thing better and honestly should’ve just scrapped the video before release.

        Auctioning off the prototype when the company asked for it back is pretty inexcusable. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t malicious, but they clearly have problems with internal communication of things like this are happening.

        At any rate, it’s going to be a spicy WAN show this week. Linus needs to actually watch the video and address this point-by-point. If he “reads the comments” or cherry picks some of GN’s weaker arguments he’s just going to end up throwing fuel on the fire.

        • @ghostinthessh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2911 months ago

          It’s pretty normal for water blocks to come out well after a GPUs release. Also it looks like it was a new product/company so it makes sense the design took longer than the competition.

        • @Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2711 months ago

          Then they shouldn’t have reviewed it if their decision was made before even holding the product in their hand.

          They could have reviewed it from the point of view of an R&D curiosity with the potential future iterations and cost reductions as the new startup finds their feet. Because, you know, that’s what it was. But they decided to shit all over it for dishonest reasons instead.

        • @nachom97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1111 months ago

          I dont think it was malicious, but it is incredibly negligent. It puts a huge stain on the company that’s expected to honor embargos for unreleased products.

        • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          I feel that if LMG looked at this product and thought “hey this is really dogshit”, the decent thing to do would have been to go back to billet and tell them we can’t cover it at all (and cop the loss of few hours as part of running an ethical business)

      • @ElusiveClarity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2411 months ago

        I don’t understand why he won’t just own up to the wrong gpu thing and move on. It’s like getting pissy that the f150 exhaust sounds like shit on your ford ranger.

      • @Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1711 months ago

        If LMG gave out a prototype for their latest screwdriver to be reviewed and it was onsold, I highly doubt it being called a “mistake” would have sufficed, heads would be rolling

        Feel terrible for Billet and how they were treated here

        • @legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          Ltt is certainly not innocent here but this one I’ll disagree with since it basically just happened to them with an early sample of the backpack.

        • @Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Billet was treated very bad here and i’m not trying to defend anyone, but i didn’t saw the video and only heard from them because of this shitshow

      • urshanabi [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This is hard to believe, it seems too comical.

        I believe you of course, and without accumulating enough about Linus’ & LTT’s antics I would have doubted you. I wonder what it is that causes these kinds of things to happen. I want to say success but I think there may be something about their ethos. Not what they espouse but what they sorta believe internally.

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 months ago

      Bad data is not the issue when they’re the ones generating it. Rushed reviews are the issue.