• henfredemars
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Don’t build your online life around Google services.

        • mlaga97@lemmy.mlaga97.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Signal is centralized, closed-source, not-selfhostable (edit: in any meaningful way) and requires being attached to a phone number. (Edit: server source is available, but self-hosting requires recompiling and distributing a custom app to all of your contacts to actually use it.)

          Matrix is decentralized, federated, fully open source with multiple client and server implementations, self-hostable, and does not require being attached to a phone number.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Which part of signal is closed source? It no longer requires a phone number, you can use a username

          • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Sure, some of those things are accurate (some are accurate-ish). However, there is way more metadata with Matrix than Signal.

            To be clear, I use both, but Matrix’ metadata problem bothers me.

            • mlaga97@lemmy.mlaga97.space
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Where the metadata goes I think is important as well.

              All Signal metadata necessarily goes through Signal’s servers and is tied to your phone number, but not all Matrix metadata ever gets near the Matrix.org if you are using a different homeserver.

              I think both are less than ideal in that regard, and I think Briar (strictly P2P) has a much better model for dealing with this at the expense of generally being a UX disaster.

              • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                That’s fair, though surely the metadata does go near matrix.org if either you contact people on matrix.org’s servers or use the fallback for calls since a lot of servers don’t have their own TURN server for that.

                I thought Signal didn’t really have much metadata or is it more that it is extremely temporary to the case where it doesn’t matter?

                And yeah, definitely agree that most extremely private (or at least marketed that way) messengers have a terrible UX and in a lot of cases UI too.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Signal is open source, session copied their entire protocol for their own messaging stack. Client and server

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t rely on any company keeping a service running unless you’ve got a contract with them