Keyoxide: https://keyoxide.org/9f193ae8aa25647ffc3146b5416f303b43c20ac3

OpenPGP: openpgp4fpr:9f193ae8aa25647ffc3146b5416f303b43c20ac3

  • 17 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 8th, 2022

help-circle









  • Yuu Yin@group.lttoLinux@lemmy.mlDownsides of Flatpak
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well; darwin users, just as linux users, should also work on making packages available to their platforms as Nix is still in its adoption phase. There are many already. IIRC I, who never use MacOS, made some effort into making 1 or 2 packages (likely more) to build on darwin.




  • Yuu Yin@group.lttoLinux@lemmy.mlDownsides of Flatpak
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When I was packaging Flatpaks, the greatest downside is

    No built in package manager

    There is a repo with shared dependencies, but it is very few. So needs to package all the dependencies… So, I personally am not interested in packaging for flatpak other than in very rare occasions… Nix and Guix are definitely better solutions (except the isolation aspect, which is not a feature, you need to do it manually), and one can use at many distros; Nix even on MacOS!