You should better read what the blind community thinks about it instead of making blanket assumptions.

Also I’m not saying that’s a good thing. It’s just an inevitable thing.

Then why respond when I was mentioning its usefulness and that the blind community was not heard by the tech bros.

It’s not, listen to the blind community instead of making assumptions (I mentioned that in my first comment).

Because good alt text needs a lot of context, so it must be done by humans for humans at our current state of tech,

Because good alt text needs to be highly context dependant, so you can’t automate it. The better alternatives we have right now are crowd-sourced alt text sites, where volunteers may generate descriptions.

Theyre adding an opt-in alt text generation for blind people

No, that’s not useful at all, but Mozilla refused to listen to the blind community.

Thanks I was going to look for one with multi OS support :)

but I also believe that dynamic, untyped languages have proven exceptionally useful for rapid prototyping and iteration.

Except that prototypes never end up as just prototypes, they die or become the real app with lots of masking tape.

Although, screen sharing has been solved a while ago. Any application that doesn’t work is because the developers are shit (I am looking into you, zoom and you half-assed implementation using an screenshot-API-based gnome-only implementation).

The blurriness comes from the (fractional) scaling mechanism use for X applications inside Wayland. Some time ago KDE enabled a mode that fixes blurriness (using the “native” X scaling).

Caddy, the configs are usually pretty simple to get you started (specially the for free https in the standard setup).