Hammer and sickle is over ❌🙅 Time to use tractor and keyboard 🚜⌨️✅💪
Hammer and sickle is over ❌🙅 Time to use tractor and keyboard 🚜⌨️✅💪
You should obviously have told them to go live in the forest and terrorise the local populace
Well the site that hosts the article looks like a masculinist dumpster fire so I’m not even bothering
They really do seem to think that other countries just sit around doing nothing until they interact with the US
Deep down they all have this conception that the whites have some kind of superior creative intellect and that only them can innovate
I read this with sped up Ben Shapiro voice
No of course, I’m not saying they should use a x86 chip, they could basically make a tablet with a nice built-in keyboard, trackpad and no touchscreen so that people can just take notes, browse internet, and write emails.
Basically I’m just advocating for making devices that are appropriate to the needs of users
Well thin laptops are way lighter, if you only want to take notes at uni it’s perfect. The problem is that they cost a shit ton of money because the constructors understood that making a super light computer with midrange smartphone level performance and price would be such a banger that they couldn’t make any money off of it. So instead they make them as powerful as possible so people have no choice but to write their thesis on machines that can run videogames for 10 minutes before overheating. That’s the stupid part.
Hilariously this implies that Taiwan is China
Oh boi I do wonder why tourists would come here, apparently the local culture is being erased and it’s now a complete cultural wasteland, there should be nothing interesting left to visit, I wonder
Literally what westerners think KJU is
• “uh my tap water doesn’t taste good”
• “SO YOU’RE SAYING IT’S BETTER TO HAVE NO WATER AT ALL??? DEBUNKED AHAH”
Yeah I’m more curious about the workers actually, it’s going to reveal if the contradiction between imperial workers and colonized people is as prevalent as I thought.
Solid guess imo. France is extremely militaristic so they might have some resources. The more I grow up the more I realise how common it is to be in the military, and we don’t even need the fucking “I pay for your overpriced education if you survive”. The French apparently cannot wait to feed the genocide machine uh
We’ll see the real nature of the French when the energy shortages come. Will they demand socialism or will they beg the state to do imperialism?
Most inventive lib/nazi slogan
Strongly anticipating the reaction of western audience to the adaptation of the Three Body Problem
Are people going to realise that the most popular fiction in China openly criticise the cultural Revolution?
Also the fact that it is made by westerners is a bit concerning
Best counter to the “hoooman natrure” argument
Same people saying Ukraine is definitely winning the war with superior might
Western “aid” always come under the conditions of structural adjustment programs that serves imperialist interests
If they cut it they might just accelerate Africa’s liberation from neocolonialism lol
The word “terrorism” is clumsy imo.
From a Marxist perspective, what the mainstream politicians call terrorism is called adventurism , ie, random acts of violence against random people. That’s the worst method of change ever it doesn’t work you can never get mass support like that.
But when we talk “eco terrorism” we don’t literally mean suicide bombing on random people, it’s more in the form of radical direct action including violent tactics in opposition to pacifist direct action right?
But if you’re gonna use “terror” I mean, you’re already on the path of Marxist revolution (“we’ll make no excuses for the terror”) as revolutionary violence consists in terrorising the reactionaries. The cool thing when you have a dictatorship of the proletariat is that your “terror” doesn’t have to randomly kill people in cruel ways, you can dismantle reactionary networks using intelligence and rely on imprisonment rather than murder.
So I’d argue that the meaningful terminology is the following: either pacifist direct action, or radical direct action (more anarchist leaning) or revolutionary action (more Marxist leaning)