Deeply disturbed by the fact that the title sounds like a haiku, but is definitely not a haiku.

Would.

For an *investing individual. But yeah, you make a good technical point. If you start investing right now, it would take quite a bit more than some good months to hit a million though.

For this particular term, slang is unending. “Cranking hog” is a personal favorite.

They read the comment you responded to. You sounded like you were answering the question posed in that comment, when in fact you were just…saying stuff related to the question, without answering it?

I’m glad you said something. I felt kinda bad sending him that way.

Uh, I see this as a reaction to people who say “what If you regret it?” to people who don’t want kids. The answer is simply “I can live with that. The inverse is harder to live with.”

Which is…pretty reasonable? You’re the one injecting paralyzing fear into the situation.

Check out Metamorphosis. It’ll surprise you.

Okay? Everyone should proofread their stuff. Why does it matter If the person who says so makes a typo? They should proofread too. Proofread your stuff, or accept that people might not understand what you’re trying to say when you don’t.

I always find it odd how people take this kinda thing as an insult. “I can’t read what you wrote because it has too many errors” is, like, one of the first things you encounter when learning to write. It’s just a simple statement of fact. Cool it.

It’s not that serious homie. Remember that synonyms exist, and humans define language.

Tbh nothing of value was lost. Once a site is sufficiently shit, blocking ads is just polishing a turd. I commend them for keeping it up this long.

I feel like you’ve just committed a crime.

What?! It’s crazy not to be able to notice that kind of assault on skin. Maniacs.

I’m the type of guy to say we ought to show the goodness of humanity even to our most evil members. But I’m not one to say you’re unjustified for any actions you take when that evil is right in front you, murdering a child. I won’t call your answer good, but I won’t call it wrong either.

I dunno how true your claim is. I’ve seen a lot of UAP footage, as well as tons of claims from people in passing that they’ve seen something. Hell, my partner has a couple stories of her own.

I can’t speak on the legitimacy of the footage or claims (I tend to assume it’s bullshit, but I’ve an open mind), but I can say there was a period of time where I saw 10s of reports a week, oftentimes the same event being documented by different people from multiple angles. I’m assuming you must be referring to official reports or something, but unofficial reports are still reports, so…

Lol yeah? And? Not every comment has to be filled with insight. You can find ideology all over the place. What you’re describing is something that humans just do, anywhere there’s a line in the sand to be drawn. It’s amplified online. It just is what it is. I don’t see how this is uniquely leftist, nor what you expect to be done about it besides, like, a moderator for every interaction involving two people who disagree with each other and don’t want to bother going into ideals? This is hardly the forum.

>describes the right

>calls it left

Every time

These days, it’s used for emphasis to make sure you’re properly upset about it. Try using it in a context where age doesn’t matter, and you see how much implied severity it can add.

“I saw you speaking to a girl. What’s up with that?”

vs

“I saw you speaking to an underage girl. What’s up with that?”

One of them sounds much more like a crime.