How is the existence of this law germane to the subject of this article, or discussion of the article here?
How is the existence of this law germane to the subject of this article, or discussion of the article here?
Indeed! Apparently I too have unwittingly been growing my collection since 1991. Of course back then we just called it “buying my music”.
I would show it off to that community but it’s just stacked in cardboard boxes (alphabetically, I’m not an animal), not nicely curated and organized and dusted weekly in pride of place. Also, I’ve never counted, but it must number in the several hundred; I wouldn’t want to overwhelm any fledgling enthusiasts there. ;)
I found this small community just a few days ago: !cd_collectors@lemmy.sdf.org Thought it was interesting, and curious. I did not know that CDs are considered by some as collectible.
Cool find, thanks :)
What about this find makes it cool?
This is available to me on Kanopy.com through my public library. Added it to my watchlist.
It’s a bandwidth and resource waste: electronic, mental, temporal.
Block user, move on.
In the few hours since you posted this question, to which you received no reply, you will of course have discovered the answer by other means.
So congrats! Now you know what soffit is. 👍
Why would you assume anything? The answer is provided in the article itself. Why can so few people be arsed to read the information provided before leaping to an attempt at pithy commentary?
The group … views Satan not as a supernatural being but as “a literary figure that represents a metaphorical construct of rejecting tyranny over the human mind and spirit.” The club’s programs, they say, focus on “science, critical thinking, creative arts, and good works for the community.”
(Boldface mine. “science” comes to us from Latin’s “scientia”: knowledge)
The irony of assuming something instead of learning/confirming it from the information provided, as regards an article about an organization whose stated focus is on knowledge and critical thinking, is disappointing.
Fixed:
They drew bags under the basilisk’s eyes for the Harry Potter Lego set; [sic] as if
it’s too tired from being woken up by kids. It’s the most relatable thing everthe skin under their eyes actually looks like that. It does.
Improved.
Add more RAM.
Oh, wait…
There’s a checkbox for this in your Lemmy account settings. It’s not in any mobile client app that I’ve tried (I don’t think so, at any rate).
Admittedly I’ve tried only 3 or 4 mobile client apps, but likely it doesn’t need to be a client setting because it’s a Lemmy setting, accessed in web browser UI.
“I’m 37, I’m not ‘old’”.
Touché.
That’s a great Stephen Wright joke:
My dental hygienist is cute. Every time I visit, I eat a whole package of Oreo cookies while waiting in the lobby. Sometimes she has to cancel the rest of the afternoon’s appointments.
You should include your URL as a header or footer on this PDF (and on the original JPEG, too) so it can be properly attributed when it inevitably gets shared.
… and now I don’t see the yellow backgrounds anymore, either. Not in litely theme nor in darkly. But now I’m glad of my earlier screenshot, as proof of what a portion of the page looked like, even if you can’t make out any of the content.
When you followed the link to that other post, was that the first time you’d opened it? I wonder if the background shading has anything to do with new comments since the last time a post was opened by you, the reader.
Here’s another post with a lot of engagement: https://lemmy.ca/post/1404816. Right now was my first time opening it.
As of this writing, it has 61 comments. They all, whether top-level or reply-to-top-level, or deeper, have white backgrounds. I’ve saved it to follow, and when/if I see its comment count has risen, I’ll check if any of them have a differently coloured background.
Edit to update, a few minutes later:
Welp, scratch the “new comments since last viewed” hypothesis. I just opened another new (to me) thread: https://lemmy.ca/post/1410603, 134 comments. All over the place: yellow top-level comments, white top-level comments, yellow replies, white replies. Chaos? So it appeared.
Then I tried changing the ordering from Hot to something else, like New or Old. Once rearranged, I noticed that all of the yellow comments – except one – were timestamped as “4 hours ago”. Anything marked as “5 hours ago” or greater had white background.
So, new hypothesis: maybe the colour is an indication of a comment’s age, relative to the time at which you are reading it, with a threshold somewhere between the 4-5 hour mark. That seems an arbitrary figure, but just based on what I observe in that new-to-me post, that’s what I’ve come up with.
The terms of this program on the Staples.com site, which servers the USA market, stipulate U.S. stores.
I would describe the recycling information at Staples.ca, which I found at https://www.staples.ca/a/content/sustainability, as no more than a collection of brochure-quality blurbs about their recycling services’ availability, with no information about an incentive program; I see no mention anywhere of paying the customer for bringing in recyclable items. That’s not to say that Staples.ca mayn’t just be slow to update with new information. If such an incentive-based initiative is in effect at Canadian stores too, that’s great news.