hypolite

@Siestacorta Très classe ce cerf-volant marémoteur, quoique j’ai des réserves sur le coût de la maintenance à long terme. Tout le système repose sur la tige et l’amarre qui doivent endurer toutes les forces en continu.

@z428 @hoergen The short answer is: it’s possible with the Diaspora protocol, not with the ActivityPub protocol. I wrote about it a while ago and this was confirmed to me: friendica.mrpetovan.com/displa…

@z428 Yes you would need all your followers to be in that group and @hoergen is correct about the feature that allows this.

@utzer I’m not sure it’s even possible with the ActivityPub paradigm where individual authors own their comments. As a result I don’t know if you can query server A for a reply that was created on server B.

This is different from the Diaspora model where the original author owns the comments, which means server A has an authoritative list of replies, including if authors are on server B.

@utzer What does this mean?

@goatsarah Thank you, and it’s okay, please take care of yourself!

@goatsarah The next stable release is planned for early September (hopefully).

@goatsarah @tobias @heluecht Yes, the first stable version of the addon doesn’t have read support. You need to switch to the develop branch on both Friendica Core and Friendica Addon.

@elena1806 @tobias @heluecht @notizie Not at the moment that I know of. At some point it’s supposed to allow people to set up their own instance, but at the moment it’s very much centralized on bsky.app.