Lol in the article it says ppls proposed shotlrting Reddit stock. I love some of those apes so much, they got great ideas.

From what I’ve seen, most judges are pretty straightforward with that shit. A couple are annoying about it, but it’s mostly the police force that pulls shit like that, and sometimes the prosecution as well.

I think he needs a therapist…

Fair enough. I am really pro AI but even then this suit is important and the mills of the courts need to start grinding on this suit since about 2y ago. So let’s get this going. Right call.

Literally illegal. Discussing crimes doesn’t equal crime, so there’s no reason for them to requeust IPs. And at least in the EU you aren’t even allowed to disclose information related to your person.

I disagree.

Both sides are bad, no matter who is currently the aggressor.

Now because there is aggression, the aggressor has an obligation to stop it, and we have an obligation to force a stop in the conflict as well. But that doesn’t make the other party less Bad in this. Both sides killed a lot of innocent people, both have inhumane ulterior motives and both are supporting further escalation. But ofc if there’s only one party doing the fighting, then that’s the party that acutely needs to be stopped.

This distinction is very important to me, because you are not suddenly the good guy because you stopped killing civilians. You are just not actively doing war crimes which means we don’t have to intervene because of you anymore, which is at least one less reason. But you are not holy because “this year it was only 300 war crimes”.

Idk if this is a hot take, but imo the war in Ukraine is pretty clear city while the Palestinian and Israeli conflict his an infinite list of wrinkles and nuances.

It’s far less controversial to say the former is Russia’s fault than it is to say the latter is either Palestine’s or Israel’s fault.

Warum zur Hölle kriegt die Presse eine Meinung in dieser Angelegenheit? Der Ethikrat sind die Jungs die sich mit solchen Themen lange befassen. Die Meinung der Medien sollte maximalst irrelevant sein.

I remember commenting on a post where China condemned Japan for doing this.

I asked ppl there “is this actually bad or is this kind of par for the course of getting rid of the dangers left behind in Fukushima?” And most of them were like “it’s not a common occurrence but it’s not inherently dangerous and it’s not that big of a deal”

To me it looks like the vast majority of objections to this came from strategic propaganda related to domestic relations of China and/or other nations.

I don’t know those two, but the idea of a scientist as president sounds awesome.

Wtf is this shit and why is there zero state wide oversight to such blatant issues? That’s some of the most straightforward bullshit I’ve read in years.

I hope they catch the perpetrators and the old mayor gets convicted of conspiracy.

Yeah I don’t like this. Can’t we just use our upvotes to decide which news are important?

You only do that to show dominance over your toilet.

Is there a reason why now? That’s the only part I don’t get

Das einzige, was beide Gruppen tun, ist Aufmerksamkeit zu generieren. Als wäre das tatsächlich noch nötig.

Es ist leichter eine Bewegung klein zu reden wenn man sie nicht Monatelang demonstrierend mehrere belebte Viertel überfluten sieht. Auch würde ich die globale Aufmerksamkeit oder selbst alleine die nationale Aufmerksamkeit von FFF nicht klein reden.

Ja, daraus ist bis jetzt nicht viel in Gesetze gefasst worden, allerdings ist das eine verdammt gute Grundlage die zukünftigen Wissenschaftlern und Politikern als Grundlage dienen um größeren nationalen und internationalen Druck auszuüben.

Eventuell könnte man sogar die Investitionen von großen digitalen Unternehmen in erneuerbare Energien auf solche Großbewegungen zurückführen.

Es ist immer leicht so etwas abzuschreiben als “kleiner Tumult ohne Konsequenzen”, aber das finde ich ein bisschen zu simpel gedacht.

Einer kleinen Gruppe Aktivisten vorzuwerfen ein komplexes globales Problem nicht eigenständig Lösen zu können is ziemlich low.

Versteh mich nicht falsch, über die Methoden kann man streiten, aber solche Aussagen verunglimpfen die Tat, aber auch die Ziele solcher Aktivisten. Und egal ob man dafür oder dagegen ist, das ist das letzte was wir gebrauchen können.

Einer kleinen Gruppe Aktivisten vorzuwerfen ein komplexes globales Problem nicht eigenständig Lösen zu können is ziemlich low.

Versteh mich nicht falsch, über die Methoden kann man streiten, aber solche Aussagen verunglimpfen die Tat, aber auch die Ziele solcher Aktivisten. Und egal ob man dafür oder dagegen ist, das ist das letzte was wir gebrauchen können.

The only way in mind this dumbing down happens is by fumbling with the model. So that’s the one thing we can be sure: the AI is most definitely changed while publicly staying “ChatGPT 4”. I assume they are either using clipping or token limitations to split the server load but fucking up the result, or they are purposely dumbing it down to capitalise on it later by introducing other pay models like ppl already mentioned.

Either way they are shooting themselves in the foot because a bunch of ppl will unsubscribe either out of spite for the change or because it’s just not worth it anymore for them.

The first part unfortunately has a chance to work. But then what? Polls show trump is not nearly as praised as he was by a bunch of ppl back then. It isn’t even clear that he will be the GOP candidate. So let’s say they get it delayed until election results are public, chances are he loses, they wasted a bunch of time, trump and judge cannon can get hammered on appeal, and he is still stuck with solid time in prison.

I mean I get your point, and while I do think it’s important to follow the law, it’s also important that no one is above the law; not even a president. But in my mind chances are so slim for him to get out of this, I just can’t see it.

“be the pillow you want to see in the world” ~ Sigmund Freud