FYI, the technical term for a mind like his is “crackpot”. Why anyone cares what he says is beyond me.

If the space is reserved for customers, and customers cannot exist because of the malfunction, the space is reserved for no one and therefore not reserved at all.

Denmark and the US are both in NATO, and NATO already has Greenland.

This is like Donald threatening Melania to steal her make up.

Gee, imagine if the Venezuelan populace had been armed last weekend.

“no one parks there until the charger is fixed”

I disagree. That is a waste of valuable space (real estate). If a driver has to park to read a sign (or figure out whether a station is broken), that is ridiculous. Ticketing officers can easily tell if non-activation is due to the station owner or the driver. If a transaction is the condition for parking, and the station owner cannot complete the transaction, the driver cannot be penalized for that failed transaction.

If I park in a bakery parking lot “for customers only” and go in to buy a loaf of bread, the baker can’t refuse the transaction because his oven is broken, and penalize me instead for parking without buying bread. The driver is not responsible whatsoever for the baker’s broken oven and it would be ridiculous for the baker to penalize him for parking with intent to be customer.

Not all Canadians, and not all Americans. In fact, I think most Canadians and most Americans do not want to enable fascism.

I don’t think so. If one of those POS wants to ICE a charger, they won’t gain anything by also damaging it.

I’m asking for opinions, not playground insults. You’re ok with parking twice if a charger is broken and that’s fine with me. I don’t think that wasted time should be on you (and everyone else later that day, week, month, etc.), and I don’t think a prime parking space should be left unusable indefinitely. But you do you.

I’ve seen chargers being left broken for over a year. In the meantime, there was no way to tell whether they’ll ever be back online.

I see no reason why the parking space should be left unused. The whole purpose is to charge, not to remove parking spaces and be a nuisance.

As I said elsewhere, a crook who wants to park illegally has no reason to also damage the station. “I was allowed to park there because I broke the charger”. Yeah sure cute.

It’s the number that’s bigger than any other.

I precisely explained why it’s ambiguous. Everything is based on the assumption of a functioning charger. Without that, everything falls apart, the sign, everything.

djt and maybe his crew said that, not me.

It’s included as the third bullet point in the summary.

So what about when a charger is broken? What would you do if you parked to charge, get out to pay and plug, and you see the charger is broken? Do you stay to run your errands, or do leave to look for a new space? That’s what I want to know.

Look, if someone wants to park in a charging space illegally, he doesn’t have to break anything. But in my experience, there is less of that (“ICE-ing”) than a few year ago.

Whether it “should” is irrelevant. It’s always been multilingual, and expecting people to change is nonsense.

He’ll make them do bad stuff and then throw them under the bus.

Confirming the military should not follow through with illegal orders.