No you weren’t. At least not in my opinion. I was just continuing the thought not refuting anything you said.
No you weren’t. At least not in my opinion. I was just continuing the thought not refuting anything you said.
You think the election posts were low quality? I was going more of a clean minimalist vibe instead. Got any tips?
If you never open your mouth they’ll never know who you are. Who knows, you might become friends.
It’s my opinion that these viewpoints aren’t applicable in reality. That’s still not a fact. I might have put it a bit more dramatically but In the end it’s still just my opinion. I state it in the hopes that someone will come along and say “no. they are applicable and here’s why”. That does not sound like denying to me.
Also even if I am denying the viewpoints I have no problem with that. They are archic viewpoints. They have very little consequence and are, in my opinion, outdated and primitive. We can do better.
That’s why I didn’t respond to everything. I responded to the thing I had a response to.
I guess you could see it that way. Just the “opinion rather than relevancy” sounds so appropriate to the downvote topic that I assumed it was that.
If you want I’ll remove it.
I thought about making a post with that quote but decided against it. Feel free to make one yourself. This community is in need of someone else to contribute as well.
It’s a different lie. Fascists lie by claiming that their people are tho one true people who deserve everything. Communists lie by telling that they’ll reach a better world. But the structure of society is the same. Do as I say or die.
Trump will challenge the integrity of the election and try to declare he is the winner in more places.
That. He will do that. No matter what happens, unless he wins, he WILL do that. At this point the only question is who the military and rest of the state apparatus will follow. And I agree this may well be the last election. But that will be the case no matter who you vote for. How this will end is dependent on the military leaders not the civilians.
That’s an opinion. Not a fact. you can tell because right before you start the quote I said “in my opinion”.
Also I’m not limiting the chart. The sectors are shown. I do accept that these ideas exist. I just don’t agree with them and wanted to discuss them. That’s why I included them in the image.
This is why I would disable them. Or call them dislikes and make them add to the score. as it’s still an opinion.
I never even said to not vote. They probably thought “fuck the state” means “don’t vote”. And they are connected but not the same.
what did I do wrong?
I read everything else. That was the only thing I had a response to.
Garbage systems should get garbage results.
The analogy doesn’t work. You wouldn’t be calling the fire department. You would be calling the people that will just freeze the house in time for 4 years and then ask you to call them again.
And not voting is going “This is stupid I don’t need to call them cause my neighbors will do so and so I should try and find another place to live” but not calling anyone and then go back to the house is stupid. Which is what most people do.
What exactly do you mean by this? How am I limiting the chart? And at what point did I state facts?
I think america might answer that question very soon. I remember reading somewhere that the WW2 Germany also had a lot of cooperation between the state and the private sector, but I don’t remember where and am not in the mood to look it up.
Anarchists should get their ideas implemented outside of the state. Build collective structures that exists separately from the state. Start from the ground up. Collectivize some farms. Then get some logistic collectives. Then start up collective food courts in a couple of cities. All functioning in a federation. Create a completely collective food distribution chain. Then start expanding it. No state needed.