• 0 Posts
  • 569 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 1st, 2024

help-circle
  • Hybrids have two drivetrains you have to pay for. That is a fact. Nothing you can say will change that.

    Those taxis could last to 999,999 miles if they kept dumping money into them. Because that is all that determines how long a car stays on the road.

    Gas drivetrains have spark plugs, ignition coils, distributors, valve cover gaskets, air filters, fuel filters, timing belts, water pumps, accessory belts, oil, oil filters, coolant, crankshaft seals, rear main seals, oil pan gaskets, transmission pan gaskets, transmission filters, transmission fluid, differential fluid, power steering fluid, and on and on and on and that’s just the maintenance.

    EVs have none of that and like you mentioned the brakes last way longer than on gas engines.

    So why would anyone waste money on a hybrid when they can get an EV?

    You are obviously shilling the way you are campaigning for hybrids.




  • Sounds like you’re claiming politicians dont accept bribes. Which is verifiably false.

    They can pay before or after, if the politician doesn’t follow through on their end wealthy people have other ways to make them pay.

    Or maybe the word gets out that a particular politician isn’t delivering. With the resources that the wealthy have they can run a smear campaign and ruin that politicians career.

    Not to mention Clarence Thomas was bribed by letting him use a super yacht. If he didn’t follow through on his end the owner could just not let him use the yacht anymore.

    There are many ways to skin this cat.





  • Uhh…they last at least a decade, which is also why for the longest time they had a 10-year powertrain warranty (as required by law to help the transition.)

    The federal law was 8 years not 10 and that did not include what they call “normal wear and tear” from the battery fully charging and depleting. So the batteries still degrade in less than 8 years and are not covered by the warranty.

    Battery management software on hybrids keep the battery cycling between roughly 40% and 80% until they age out and the bands have to increase. On plug-in hybrids it is managed a bit more complex, with a pocket of energy saved for the plug-in charging/driving. Same principle though.

    Some manufacturers use their software to prevent the battery from fully charging and discharging but it is not required or used by all manufacturers. When it is used it effectively limits your battery capacity in the same way a degraded battery is limited. So it is the same result.

    Also, since the engine in a hybrid does not have to run a full duty-cycle, nor run at high RPM/power levels as frequently as an ICE-only vehicle, the engine also has a longer more gentle life.

    Engines experience the most wear and tear on start up because until the engine is turning, the oil isn’t pumping so on start up the internal parts of the engine are lubricated the least. So hybrids maximize the wear and tear on gas engines.

    Not to mention, what you’re describing is what has been known for decades as “city miles” as opposed to “highway miles”. The stop and go, starting and stopping maximizes the wear and tear on the engine and minimizes its lifespan.

    Subarus need their headgaskets changed more frequently than a good hybrid would need batteries.

    This is because Subarus use a unique engine design that no one else uses with head gaskets as a pattern failure.

    Using it in a hybrid means you’re paying for the head gaskets and the hybrid systems failures.

    Someone’s been reading “I’m scared of the future” myth web sites.

    I’ve been a master mechanic for over 20 years now. I’m certified in hybrids and EVs and spent a lot of time working on used cars. That’s what I’m basing my comments on.

    Like clockwork, hybrid vehicle owners sell their vehicles before the power train warranty is up because warranties don’t cover normal wear and tear.

    Hybrids have two drive trains with twice the maintenance and part failures. Both drivetrains operate under the worst conditions (fully charge/deplete, start/stop) so when they start to break down it is twice as expensive.











  • The problem with that approach is you do all the work for the GOP propaganda machine every time you argue against a democratic candidate.

    So by the time your revolution fails, your campaign gets weaponized by the GOP. Everything negative you had to say about the democrat candidate is now being said by the GOP. And it’s super effective at convincing some democratic voters to stay home because it’s the same talking points used by their own party.

    Instead of trying to discourage voters from choosing democrats, leftists should just say why voters should chose the leftist and accept the results when voters choose the moderate option.



  • They’ve literally won the majority of elections since the 90s by appealing to moderates. They lost in 2024 because Russia had a war at stake and billionaires didn’t want to get taxed. Add in inflation from the pandemic and you have a tough campaign to win.

    The argument that democrats can’t win without the left is not based on reality.

    Dems tried to appeal to leftist and they screeched “genicide Joe” until Trump won.

    Meanwhile republicans won because voters to the right of leftist know the importance of not shitting on the candidate they want to win.