Because the candidate running against Hitler was so terrible that there was no enthousiasm left to stop Hitler?
Because the candidate running against Hitler was so terrible that there was no enthousiasm left to stop Hitler?
It is the opposite. People join an instance which does not agree with their point of view. They get banned. They move to a different instance.
Echo chamber galore.
What responsibility? Harris is not responsible for anything genocide related right?
Similarly I have this advice: not voting for Harris does not mean you did not vote for Harris.
The genocide is already happening under Kamala.
Leia said she will be a dictator on day one. She will be worsr than Vader. The choice is obvious.
Harris is not engaged in the genocide,
And there’s no way to reach your position through intellectual honesty.
They should vote for Hitler who is genociding them.
The article title says “Bernie Sanders Rejects the Idea of a Permanent Ceasefire Between Israel and Hamas”
Israel was committing their genocide in full effect for months at that point. “Israel has the right to defend itself” is absolutely no excuse to oppose a permanent ceasefire. It was willful ignorance at best.
Loyd Austin is a notorious Tankie.
Did he? My memory is jumbled. It has Bernie full steam ahead defending genocide for at least three months
Jaycarring is the new trend
No human could have avoided that deer without swerving their car.
A lidar provides superhuman vision which works in the dark and through fog. Elon is making a human car and ignores all the limits we have that can be solved in other ways.
A human is a general purpose organism. We are not designed as specialized driving machines.
The autopilot knows deers can’t sue
deleted by creator
War in Gaza… Is Bernie still doing genocide denial?
If Kamala doesn’t get the Dubya endorsement I am not voting for her. I only listen to the worst of war criminals for political guidance.
You need to ignore that. It would mean Democrats are Nazis too. That doesnt fit their narrative.