It only spreads fascism if you’re unable to refute them. Are your arguments against it that weak?
It only spreads fascism if you’re unable to refute them. Are your arguments against it that weak?
Free speech as a law, maybe, but many people like myself view it as an ideal.
Just keep in mind that banning people who are wrong does not change their mind or reduce their number. The only way to change anything is to actually engage and correct them if they’re wrong.
Wow. That sucks.
The car of a suspended license haver.
And if they’re fine voting in a dementia sufferer because they recognize her name on the ballot? That’s the biggest problem currently is uninformed voters just keep voting the same people in. Not because they like what they’re doing but because they recognize the name.
Wat
It’s all well and good to be firing blanks if you want. The two are just not comparable and I have no clue what you were trying to say.
You just have to make sure not to crush them up since they have a protective layer to allow animals to eat and pass them for proper spread.
Ah yes. Intersex people. What’s the percentage on that? 0.01%? Why bother catering to such a vanishingly small segment of the population with your language? For the vast vast majority of people sex is the “gender assigned at birth”. It’s the genetics definition.
It was commented by the Sync developer, I think, that they made their app as a single developer. The Reddit app is made by 200 god damn people and sucks. That’s a major symptom.
There’s actually a word for “Gender assigned at birth” and it’s sex. Biological sex.
Everybody should probably delete concern troll from their lexicon. All it does is let you dishonestly dismiss any criticism you don’t like.