On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.
Trespass to land is a tort, which means there’s the potential for monetary damages.
On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.
Trespass to land is a tort, which means there’s the potential for monetary damages.
I guess that kinda depends on the business structure. Are they fully owned and operated by the main corporation? Or are they licensees of the store’s name and brand? If it’s the first one, some humdrum middle manager could do what you said. If it’s the later, those surveillance things could be trespassing.
Even if they are tenants to a lease, the doctrine of quiet enjoyment would prohibit a landlord from being able to freely agree to having police property sitting on the store’s parking lot if their lease covers the parking lot. It’s kinda like renting a house with a yard: your lease is for the house and the yard surrounding the house. A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.
the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.
If they’re on a store’s parkinglot, they’re trespassing if they’re there without the store’s consent. That means they can be removed.


deleted by creator


I really hope Republican states are the ones that will suffer the consequences of their voting.


I dunno. Mar-a-lago is probably a prime target.


I really hope the comming insurgent attacks (like 9/11) target Republican states. Democrats voted against this, and the consequences need to be born by Republican states.


Michael Green, a really big Wallstreet portfolio manager, says that 140,000 might be the new poverty line. So, that might be a pretty good guess?


Is this title suggesting that the only good Republican is a dead Republican? It sounds like this title is suggesting that the only good Republican is a dead Republican. I wonder if the only good Republican is a dead Republican. I’m going to need to think on whether the only good Republican is a dead Republican. Does anyone else have any thoughts on whether the only good Republican is a dead Republican to help me contemplate on whether the only good Republican is a dead Republican?


100k USD is barely anything in a big city.


Last hired, first fired


Were Boomers in power then? Ah, yeah they took over sitting as president after Regan, so like late 80s/early 90s. They’ve been sitting as president since, and they’re the most spoiled generation there has ever been. So, it makes sense they’d ignore anything with consequences later down the line. Everything was handed to them, then they hiked up the ladder behind them.


sick people are profitable
For the care providers? Yes.
For the insurance companies? No.
So what ends up happening is the parasite class ends up draining you of money while you don’t need it. Then, when you’re sick or injured, the parasites deny your claims generated from the health care. That way you don’t have enough money to cover your medical bills independently. So, you die without care and drained of resources, and the health-care providers eat up your carcass trying to recover their share. This ends up being the most ecconomical outcome for all parasites.


Always has been?


There’s no better Republican Nazi than a dead one.


Does it come with an equivalent to uBlock? Can you port over your bookmarks from firefox?


We didn’t replace workers like we thought we would.
-Rich people, effectively.
Time for a strike?