Yeah, did:web exists, but I still called it centralized because it still relies on did:plc pretty much everywhere (though honestly domain name handles might actually be did:web, not sure). Didn’t know about that dual setup by Bluesky though!

I did notice the @handle.invalid! Thanks!

My understanding was that activitypub was basically a rough formalization of existing protocols, designed to be as flexible as possible. More a template than a real protocol. Unfortunately mastodon’s popularity basically made a bunch of things de-facto obligatory but not well documented, and there’s still a bunch of ways to do… anything.

That link doesn’t work for me, but I ended up finding a post by them that seems to correspond. Good to know, thanks! Seems like it’s realistic but expensive still (150$/mo?), and it’s not gonna get cheaper… I hope they figure out a way to make them less centralized.

I believe that’s your handle, not your identity. Your handle resolves to your identity, but your identity isn’t directly tied to it, in case you lose the domain.

The aggregator is called the Relay, and I haven’t even found anything suggesting one could realistically selfhost it. Then you need to handle the massive stream of data coming through it with AppViews, which are tough to handle too (there are a few but not many iirc).

That said, I am also impressed with the thought behind ATProtocol. It seems much more robust and defined than ActivityPub.

Bluesky’s federation model is actually quite interesting, they go for a very portable approach vs activitypub’s instance-basis. Unfortunately, there’s still a massive centralization point (the main relay, the only thing that can really handle the firehose), and identity is also centralized, albeit has mechanisms to be decentralized.

I don’t think this is gonna work. You can’t just ban something like that, you have to provide alternatives, and there aren’t any. There needs to be a Club Penguin-type “kids internet”. Course, dealing with children’s data is “too expensive” (and risky), so that’s not gonna happen.

How the hell does Vee know that lmao

He did, but that could reasonably be explained away as “incredibly naïve and it’s not direct harm”. That said he probably would have instead tried to talk to Belos if he really was that naïve… hm.

… ohh, Hunter’s gonna turn evil, isn’t he. Instead of a redemption arc he gets a corruption arc. Amity too, and Lillith potentially too. Maybe, assuming we’re sticking with “seriously evil, King is a head” instead of “cartoon villainy”

Dog heaven is also pig hell. It’s a very efficient system.

… man, if we ever meet Odalia in this universe, it’s gonna be weird.

Thank you!

I would love to know as well!

I pronounce it da-eh-mon in my head, it sounds more old-timey than “dee-mon”.

I wonder how this one survived 400 years though…

Considering the painbows a flaming wind doesn’t sound impossible

Ah, my bad then.

… what you said is correct, but that’s superposition, not entanglement. Entanglement is when you create a product state of several qubits that cannot be decomposed into a tensor product of basic states (a single proton/photon/whatever).