Philosophosphorous [comrade/them, he/him]

  • 2 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2024

help-circle








  • this seems true for pretty much any male-dominated hobby, men ruin everything they form communities around. its true for games, guns, history, military, sci fi, martial arts, metal music, anime, etc… how do straight men even stay attracted to straight women, they gatekeep each other out of their hobbies (or rather, men gatekeep both women from ‘men’s hobbies’ and men from ‘women’s hobbies’), idk how any straight couple survives without shared interests other than fucking. like the stereotypical boomer couple doesn’t do anything together except eat.



  • materialism resolves into animism when analyzed closely

    humans = complex physical processes from whence ‘human minds’ arise as an emergent property

    in other words, when a physical phenomena becomes complex enough, or has a structure of a certain type, it is capable of producing the ‘immaterial’ (in the sense that ‘information’ is immaterial, or is ‘the same information’ regardless of its physical instantiation in different media) phenomena we call ‘thought’ or ‘mentation’

    its a main facet of materialism that mental phenomena supervene upon/arise from/are equivalent to physical phenomena, are only instantiated in the form of physical processes

    now compare the relative complexity, in terms of information processing instantiated in the form of physical processes, of a human and, say, The Sun

    is The Sun any less complicated, in all its detailed particle movements, than a human brain? Sure, the structure is vastly different, but there remain regularities (homeostasis, even) in a dynamic physical process.

    Is there any real reason to say, then, that consciousness (in its material conception as a physical process or emergent property of such) can only arise from one kind of physical phenomena (human/earth animal brains/nervous systems) and no other? What, specifically, about the earth animal nervous system differentiates it from EVERY SINGLE OTHER PHYSICAL PROCESS in this sense of ability to generate consciousness? What about the physics of the human brain would ever imply anything like the rich inner life we have, any more than a plant or a rock or a vibrating quantum field or a calculator or empty vacuum?

    If one special physical process can mysteriously generate the phenomenon of consciousness, in a way that is difficult to verify in others in an objective sense even with verbal self-reports, how can we say whether any other physical process can generate this phenomenon or something like it?



  • on the 360 playing battlefield bad company i assumed terrain destruction and stuff would be the norm in the future and maps would be a lot bigger with more people, i was too stupid to realize that the most important part of gaming is that the graphics get un-noticeably, incrementally better over time without any fundamental changes to gameplay or possible art styles, everything must be bland and ‘photorealistic’ or else it must be Fortnite. I used to assume a good game would get a sequel in a year or two and have significance game improvements, now i wait a decade or more to get the exact same game but with higher resolution and frame rate and new microtransactions





  • hes fantasy batman crossed with forest gump, a mary sue ‘the best ever at fighting’ character and master detective who ‘tries to stay out of politics’ but ends up being involved in every important thing that ever happens anywhere, and gets the opportunity to fuck every woman mage in the land. every person in the setting that isn’t also a witcher or a mage rightfully sees him as an inhuman monster, it does the x-men thing where it portrays the superhuman monster-people as ‘oppressed minorities’, meanwhile accidentally justifying their oppression by making them actually materially physically very dangerous to those around them. early in the 3rd game these 3 human guys will team up on the witcher for making a politically controversial statement, expecting a bit of a scuffle or fist fight brawl, and he decapitates them all with his superhuman sword skills. they were unarmed.




  • i will never beat a dark souls game. i could, but it would be (and has been so far) a joyless slog of grinding for resources so that i can make any new weapons or armor i find actually worth using. getting new items isn’t fun, it only means awkwardly travelling to whatever region has enemies that drop the most titanite shards and spending hours battling enemies in a region you finished hours ago just so that the new item does more than a pittance of damage. plus i really really expected elden ring to have any kind of climbing, even a simple ledge-clamber, after sekiro’s ninja-parkour, and instead all we got was a useless crouch button and a less flavorful jumping mechanic. they’ve essentially been re-releasing the same game with a different map since demon’s souls. overrated trash series, from software should have stuck to armored core games imo and i’m only partially saying that because i am obsessed with mechs. i would rather play EVE online and i hate spreadsheets.