That’s just untrue and there is no science supporting this. A right wing opinion piece is not science. ;)

https://archive.ph/2RQgG

Scheint ein Gerücht zu sein.

Although understandable from an economicals standpoint, substantial evidence points to housing first as a solution to homelessness.

Yes, some people stay indefinitely, that’s the point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housing_First

Edit: herea is a great documentation including explanations why it works

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwZQ8GCHgRg

They are spectators themselves. Fans if you wish. They have seen a thousand dictators, but a Luigi is news to them.

I would assume so.

Jumper

I’m talking kindergarden and school aged kids. So simple violence will do. But there is always the option to just leave and do nothing. So as long as that option is on the table, there is never a need for violence. This makes the violent option always defensive.

I teach my kids that violence is the last option and that they better show they have been fucking creative with finding alternative options first.

Better they fight each other instead of dominate the world together. Its called the balance of power. Sadly

My man! please enjoy the down votes. At least you tried. Id encourage everyone at least tries once in their lives. I’d wager most keyboard warriors here have never tried but are quite versed in paint.

At least they engage in discussion with other minded people. Challenging their beliefs which I prefer over bubble think. :)

I’m guessing that’s a church?

I understand survivorship bias and i understand there is luck involved. But that doesn’t change that somebody has to do business and that everybody can try and that being an employer is not as simply evil as people here want to believe.

Yeah that’s not how that happens. There is an incentive problem, no doubt. Executives do whatever evil shit to earn money for shareholders, while shareholders elect those bringing in the most money while not caring about how that happens.

People driving combustion cars more than required because its convenient are not evil people and yet they ruin the climate slowly but surely. Its an incentive problem.

Die haben auch einen Gummi Bund. Ich behaupte durch bessere Zirkulation sind die Füße eher warm. :)

Socken drücken das Blut ab, vor allem nachts wenn man schläft und der Blutdruck niedrig ist.

Old tech is more like it. Good basics but you wouldn’t code in ASM must of the time even if you learned it.

Yeah those shares are owned by somebody and that’s usually consumers too… I’d wager most of them are good people too.

Well I can just say I started a business while being a broke student and without a penny to my name. Just find the first customer and start working. The money is shit but it fed my baby and wife and a small apartment. Kept working my ass off several years and started employing some of my fellow students. You argue you have to have money to make money, but according to you all those people earn so much more money. Nobody talks about all these years invested into getting up that point. I’m nearly forty and can now slowly start saving some money while most of my peers are paying off their first home while living in it. My employees are payed well and like working for me. I don’t think calling that exploitation would be in any way correct. I feel the hate, and I understand not everybody has marketable skills but I was basically a Linux and coding nerd without a degree with a baby and wife and no family to help. Its hard and I had the opportunity and I feel most business owner got their start like that. There are obviously people with rich parents yada yada and obviously not every business works with zero capital startup money but that’s just how it is.

Tldr: dog and cat good, hamster bad.

They won’t remember for long… ;)