Kenzie Reeves

Doesn’t look AI generated, but does look Photoshopped. The pattern continues across the body in a way that looks like it’s been overlaid in post rather than painted on.

Pretty sure that’s her old account, new one is u/xyzaly (also goes by both zipos and zipoz on OF if that’s your thing)

This is definitely AI generated, but how does the main text look so good?

This post and your comments here give off the impression that you only posted here for 2 things: money and validation. While this isn’t inherently a bad thing, implying that people who don’t tip you are lesser (not “one of the good ones”, as you say) will get you nowhere.

If you want to call anyone who dares say anything less than positive about you a troll and want to leave because of that, that’s fine. We simply won’t be the simp echo chamber that you seem to want us to be.

I had no idea they were so expensive! This is rather eye-opening, and it definitely gives new perspective to some of the points I made. Thank you for the insight.

I can see how you might reach that conclusion, but consider this: do you feel it is correct to bring a life into the world knowing that you can’t afford to provide for them? To me, that’s placing an unnecessary burden on both your family and society.

Though with that being said, someone else mentioned that reversals are ~$10,000, which is obscenely expensive and way more than I thought it would be, so the current cost of them does make it seem like I’m saying “only the rich should have children”, even when I’m not.

You’d be better off using an upscaling AI to do this rather than an AI that tries to reinterpret what’s already there. Go grab a pirated copy of Topaz Video Enhance and you’ll see what I mean.

Doesn’t work on mobile :(

This is the first time I’ve ever seen positive sentiment for Google+ online.

I come from early YouTube where it was forced upon us from above, so I’m genuinely curious as to what positives you see in it.

An evening with my what? /s

What’s Reactor?

It can’t be that it’s defederated because I was using an account local to that instance. Plus, loading the community on a browser works fine.

I went full Firefox a few weeks ago. It’s been mostly fine but there are a few weird hitches that Chromium-based browsers just don’t have. So because of that I currently think Brave is a good recommendation for most people.

Here’s a sneak peek of the progress for the next version of the LoRA:

I think the colours are better and everything is just a bit more consistent, but there is still more work to be done.

I want to! Even if it’s just a little, I think adding context makes things like this so much better. Plus it gives you the opportunity to continue that story later if people like it!

Yes! I asked her before I started. I may be a degenerate, but I’m not that bad.

Adding the word “scientific” to your point doesn’t make it more believable.

In fact, it detracts from your point by making you sound like you don’t know how to use the word.

The source is Lover In Law.

It’s engagement farming.

Notice how they’re all questions? The way this works on other social media is you ask something in a community that most people will have an opinion on, but frame it opposite to that opinion (e.g. the tiny tits question), and that will give you a bunch of engagement through comments which tells the algorithm the post is more interesting so it pushes the post higher to raise visibility to keep people on the site longer to view more ads.

The thing is, Lemmy does not have an algorithm like that, so it’s pointless to do here.