Encrypted 🤐

  • 4 Posts
  • 59 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 26th, 2024

help-circle




  • Yeah, I’m not exactly thrilled on chrome either but at a certain point I think it comes down to “who’s fucking me the least”. Which I totally understand it’s probably still chrome but I think just like with privacy, there is no sweet spot with browsers. It’s all subjective on each person’s threshold and what they want/need.

    Call me crazy, but an example I’ve been thinking about is this:

    Firefox is great. But with their recent TOS addition a lot of people want to jump ship of which ive seen a lot reference forks of Firefox. If, hypothetically, mozilla followed suit and became the next google, wouldnt a lot of those forks just be getting their updates from upstream (depending on the type)? And either way, they would be gecko which is developed by mozilla. So if 10 years from now mozilla goes the data route then we could be back in the same predicament.

    Of course, those forks might not add crypto or screw over creators by affiliate link highjacking so I get there’s more to it then that.

    But either way, I kinda look at these things like the Signal messenger argument. Is it a perfect solution? No, some people say go further because it’s centralized but it does offer a great mix of security and eas of access. And I think those trade offs apply to browsers as well.

    Anyways, thanks again and have a good one as well! I appreciate the discussion!


  • Thanks for actually answering my question. It was a genuine question based on my opinion for what I knew.

    Based on those articles, the crypto stuff doesn’t necessarily worry me as much as the affiliate highjacking that they were caught doing. I wasn’t aware. Honey recently got caught up In a scandle just as bad if not worse (by scale of users).

    And yeah, I heard Opera was pretty terrible. I wanna say I heard the developers of themselves opera left and created Vivaldi and Opera is Chinese owned I think? I could be wrong on that.

    Either way, thanks.



  • I used to use Plex as well but similar to your remarks, they started doing a lot more updates that added a “corporate” feel to it such as adding their own movies/tv. Nothing inherently wrong with that but in my opinion, when a platform has the option to add features such as that, that costs money. And they’re gonna want to get that money back somehow. Yeah they offer subscriptions but to me this all was a redflag that I could see them taking further in the future. Where as Jellyfin is completely free at the cost of a little extra work to setup.


  • For your first question, my guess would be its the largest fish. Proton probably has some users that harbor useful information but think about apples market dominace. It’s massive. And as far as I know, proton doesn’t have a business presence directly under UK jurisdiction; Apple has an enormous presence and billions in previous investments for employees and infrastructure there. Making it much easier to enforce those laws on them.

    In other words, it’s like living in the country versus living in another country. My home country will have a much easier time forcing laws on me than a country I’m not even living in.

    I’m unable to answer your second question though. I don’t know enough about legality.


  • Unfortunately, I say yes. And hear me out first please.

    The Fediverse in my eyes should be free. Free to have instances for everyone, including those we disagree with. Because in my opinion, the right to say and think what we want is very important (absolute free speech). And unfortunately, i think that means everyone should be allowed to say what they want. HOWEVER, free speech does not mean free of consequences. The option of federating with those groups or not is up to each community and fortunately I think many would not be okay with including them.

    I’m always open to hearing input as these are personal thoughts so by all means add to or let me know the errors in my thinking. Thanks!







  • So from what I understand, theres 2 common ways that browsers combat this. Someone add to or correct me if I’m wrong.

    1. Browsers such as Mull combat this by looking the same as every other browser. If you all look the same, it’s hard to tell you apart. I believe this is why people recommend using default window size when using Tor.

    Ex: Everyone wearing black pants and hoodies with the facemasks. Extremely hard to tell who is who.

    1. Browsers such as Brave randomize metadata that fingerprinting collects so that it’s more difficult to piece it all together and build a trend/profile on someone.

    Ex: look like a dog in one place, a cat in another place. They get data for a dog but that doesn’t help build anything if the rest of the data is a cat, hamster, whatever. No way to piece it together to be useful.

    In both my examples, there are caveats. Just because everyone dressed the same doesn’t mean someone isn’t taller or shorter, or skinnier or fatter. There can still be tells to help narrow down. Or a cat that barks like a dog suddenly is more linkable to a dog if that makes sense lol.

    In other words it still depends user behavior that can contribute to the effectiveness of these tools.

    EDIT: got distracted. To answer your question I don’t think so. I think it’s more about user behavior blending in or being randomized. I think the only thing an extension would be able to do is possibly randomize the data but I’m unsure of such an extension yet. These aren’t the only options, these are just ones I’ve read about recently. Online behavior, browswr window size, and I’m sure so much more also goes into it. But every little bit helps and is better than nothing.

    EDIT2: Added examples for each for clarity.