Don’t see why this was removed. Though it does go right back to OP’s victim mentality.

Hell, does anyone perfectly explain everything to each other all the time in the real world?

No, so this argument fails there too.

In the story we just don’t know why things aren’t disuccessed “perfectly”. Like why does Hermione not explain to Ron that she likes him, instead she has a fight with him. Wasn’t that an issue for OP? (It wasn’t for me, because I understand emotions challenge us to communicate well, and I’m an old fart without the hormones of a teen).

Kids world and adult world are separate. Kids very often don’t want adult involvement in their world - they see it as an intrusion. There’s also a general distrust of adults: “you just don’t understand”, or “things are different now than when you were my age” are the refrains we hear every generation. Again, I’m old enough to have seen this several times.

And the adults are busy with their own responsibilities, so won’t always catch on to what’s happening in the kid’s world.

Most importantly, the adults have to allow kids room to figure things out on their own, to struggle with difficulties. Always being there means the kids never learn to solve problems themselves, to build their own relationships, to figure out how to identify good people, etc.

Also, people are human, warts and all, communication is hard.

As a kid, getting explanations for things out of adults felt nearly impossible. I’m sure part of that was my phrasing as a kid, I just didn’t know how to formulate a good question, plus adults surely thought I was often a smart ass or just asking dumb questions with obvious answers.

Why am I not surprised.

The FDA is exactly the opposite of what it was mandated for.

Guess a bunch of people like to see CA dictate to half of all other states.

Authoritarian much?

Yep.

Hahaha

Hour of cardio? Maybe 2!😲

Lol, there’s a name for “doing it but I really don’t/shouldn’t be”.

I’m kinda relieved. I too was spending far too much time there. Got a new start here, thing I’m gonna “curate” (ugh, hate that word) my feed to just useful stuff. Block news, politics, emotional tugs, etc. Just “how does this work” kinda stuff.

Thanks for finding which paper it was… I have a copy but didn’t feel like finding it and finding the right paper. Call me lazy 🤷‍♂️

And in the end, they codified what they saw as a natural, inborn, individual right. That wasn’t by accident - Jefferson was very intentional in the words he chose (and they argued over, properly). Knowing the language had to be clear and concise, this is what resulted. It’s pretty clear if you’ve read anything from 1600 onward.

Some of how the writing of the time (and place, Britain) flows is, I suspect, partly an influence of French language that some also knew - “twenty and four years” is clear French construction, not English at all. Keeping in mind that before Shakespeare, the “English language” such as it was, was considered beneath “proper” Brits. Shakespeare marks the beginning of that change, so the French language influence carried on for a long time among the upper classes as a distinction.

It’s pretty interesting to see this same kind of complex construction (from our perspective) in period writings, but also in many science papers today, where complex ideas are strung together in paragraph-long sentences in an attempt to capture the detail and nuance. Medical journals are particularly guilty of this.

Thanks for doing the leg work, I wasn’t sure where to start and figured I’d end up down a rabbit hole…too easily distracted!

Hmm, maybe it’s a state level thing then?

Thanks for the info, gonna have to look into it.

Lol, I can appreciate your commitment. We all have our white whales, mine are rear fingerprint and cordless charging. Edit: Also prefer as much plastic as possible. Make it lighter and less likely to break. I have a ceramic phone, it’s pretty (when it’s out of the case) but it’s heavy. So breakage is more likely to happen. I also have a Moto E5. You can throw it across the room.

I’ve had probably 5 times as many USB C port failures as I have micro ports… And I’ve had like 5 phones with micro (which needed charging all the time) and 2 with C. I do think C is better overall, but I don’t believe the durability claims. I already have a nice phone that really can’t be used for much since the C port died, and it’s part of the motherboard. Fortunately it has wireless, so I can use it for a spare device, just not a daily.

Whenever someone says it isn’t dead to them, it tells me they don’t realize most average consumers care about convenience most of all.

They (the average consumer - that is about 98% of them) don’t understand the tech, so have no way of forming an opinion or realizing why they may want a jack.

Or removeable batteries, etc. They’re easily swayed by shiny and seemingly “easy to use”.

Well, kids, especially pre-teen to teen, are idiots. I know, because I was one. And my friends and classmates were too.

Right?

Filth. Vermin. How many other people did they screw over under the badge?

I’m fine with longer. 20 sounds good.

Plus massive fines, like 5x what they stole, paid to the victims.

Vile garbage.

Niiice. Lol.

Pill form doesn’t do Jack shit either.

Pseudoephedrine works like a charm though.

Fortunately I’ve been stocking up, since you can only buy one damn box a month.

Bastards.

It requires a flashed rom with a valid (key signature? Crap, forget what it’s called).

If you flash an unsigned kernel and try to boot lock, it’ll brick.

I get from an absolute security perspective why this is deemed important, I just feel there’s a bit too much focus on it, as if an unlocked bootloader is really that insecure. It would still take tremendous effort to get the encryption key for storage, so it’s pretty effectively secure still.