I kind of wish ap would include things like this:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/092024zr_h3cj.pdf

In this case it’s almost nothing, but sometimes it’s nice to have for the longer documents. I’d also like a link to the original decision they were appealing.

It’s bad when you are the most vocally anti regulation party, and cato goes at you.

In 2015 the night he announced 2 of his supporters beat a homeless man with a pipe and urinated on him. They turned to the camera and said “trump 2016”. He took days and more than one interview to condemn them. This was before he realized he could lie and misdirect these thing.

I’m commenting this a few times, but Alaska has implemented ranked choice, has a number of environmentalists and does outsized damage to the environment. If they were serious they’d run in state elections there, and four congress there. They are not.

I think ap doesn’t mean advanced placement, but associated press. Or I got whooshed.

I guess this will be the new birth certificate thing for them.

I believe he actually found a 17th century justification for abortion that he pretended was against it by not reading the next few paragraphs.

It just happens on autopay. I forget about it until my credit card about to expire

Appropriate content for the publisher

I heard this a couple of days ago, and the more I’m looking into it, the more I find the green party a joke at best.

Alaska has a number of things. A population of conservationists amoung the general population who are likely disaffected. An environment that is being exploited harder than most states. Now ranked choice voting. Most people would see them as the environmentalist party. How much good could they do towards that cause if they got into that state legislature? What if they could take the congress seat or a senator? If they took the electoral votes it would be harder since the ranked choice only seems to be for the states choice, but they could prove they could win at some level. How many candidates are they running in Alaska? One, jill stein. How much effort are they putting in there for her? I can’t tell. The main criticism of them does not exist there, but they aren’t even trying. They can accomplish many of there goals there more easily than anywhere else. It’s the perfect storm for them. Pathetic.

There are two states where ranked choice exists apparently. Are these the states that the third parties are spending money in? They’d be the most likely places for them to win and show they are viable in any way.

It’s my turn to say it now:

Doesn’t he look tired?

The larger plane needed to show dominance

The need for legal immunity is what sent Ceasar to March on rome.

I saw a video recently where the guy was talking about how the us navy is failing at maintenance. He explained that a lot of it was turnover. A lot of skilled labor was leaving. It took me a minute to remember, but I actually used to be employed as a contractor working on the software that did just that. I didn’t make weapons, or anything that would be exported. Just software that organized ship maintenance. I wouldn’t go back regardless, but the reason I left isn’t the reason I wouldn’t go back. I don’t feel as comfortable with the military as I did a almost a decade ago when I was hired.

But why did I leave? Years of uncertainty from shut downs and funny budget fluctuations. All the comments on the video said to pay more, but I turned down a raise to get stability when I left. Myself and several people left around that same time. I assume for the same reason. They like pretending that they have broken nothing when the money comes back online. They’ve broken a lot of things including the “military readiness” they pretend to care about.

Really? Why did they allow those private farms at all then? My understanding was that the farms that were collectivized only produced enough for themselves to eat, so they went back a little and said “okay, you can have SOME capitalism until we get it figured out”. How they figured it out was quotas, and hey, on paper it looks good. You just have to tell Stalin a good number. Somehow the store room’s still empty.

If it was about verifying that votes were legitimate they shouldn’t have a problem appropriating finding so that we go out to every single citizens house and ensure they are issued an ID that is to their standards (which they claim is citizenship). We know it’s actually about ensuring that people who have a difficult time getting an id have a difficult time voting.

Edit. Whoops I spelled some thing wrong

That’s a good point. A family doesn’t just have to be your flesh and blood though. It can be your community as well, but I know I wasn’t thinking that even though I should have been. I don’t see much of the leadership on the trump team expressing love to even their flesh and blood even if I do apply a strict definition of family.

I don’t think women in general love trump. I think that’s a difficult demo for him. Sure I can find a few at his events but the average woman really doesn’t like him. Does that mean he’s not masculine? They are just inventing little things to be on the surface of what is and isn’t masculine. Walz has the only core masculine traits I can think of. He loves and takes care of his family. Everything else is superfluous window dressing. These guys only care about dressing though.

Republicans:“democrats are trying to get ILLIEGALS to vote. We have no proof but ahhhhhhhhh!”

Democrats:“man do you remember how close they were when they were caught on video ACTUALLY STORMING THE CAPITOL BUILDING! I bet that they may try something else, like those fake electors, or…read the article”