Isnt Israel the original invader?

Which side? :D

Everybody should have a right for birth control and abortion without any age limits. I dont really see how thats related to permanently life altering changes being made underaged.

”Only those minors who have shown “a long-lasting and intense pattern of gender nonconformity or gender dysphoria” would be allowed to start puberty blocking or hormone treatment, and only under a set of guidelines to be drafted by the state’s newly appointed chief medical officer, Dr. Timothy Tesmer.”

Sounds fairly reasonable to me. We are not the smartest as teens nor do we have the capacity to make life lasting decisions. In my opinion minors should be treated as minors.

Mentally I’ll person flailing two knives. Seems that in this case the use of lethal force was justified. If she survived, she wouldnt have been a positively productive part of society anymore anyways.

Nuclear is greener than hydro and has caused less casualties than hydro. That should be well enough indicator of nuclears greeness to the common folk.

Yeah, sure. People murder people. We still have religion around alltough thats well documented of killing people daily and raping children.

You are really overplaying anything negative thats even loosely linked on nuclear. Modern well managed nuclear is the most environmentally friendly source of energy. It takes so little space, produces so little easily managed waste and enormous amounts of energy. With all the facts and statistics its a no brainer.

You do realize that your links just prove the nuclear energys safety? There have been few tens of incidents over the years and every single one is documented with care and overall the amount of casualities is miniscule. We’ve had more people dying from hydro by itself.

Nuclear is greener energy than many of the other alternatives. It doesnt take much space in the nature and produces miniscule amount of waste that is easily stored and by nature will cease to exist in it’s radiant form over the years.

Nuclear is part of green energy movement and the most important piece of it. By this date no other form of green energy is capable of replacing nuclear. Not an opinion but a fact. It just really seems people still opposing nuclear dont understand how it produces energy, how strict the safety measurements are and how little waste it produces.

They did run germanys nuclear down. That increases the usage of coal. In finland the activists have opposed nuclear as well which has droven usage of coal up. This is one of the big reasons the green party lost the election so colossally here few months ago. Im driven by science and facts provided by science. Anybody opposing nuclear doesnt know/understand enough about the subject and is droven by emotion.

They do by opposing nuclear. Good examples in Germany and in my home country Finland. Solar/wind cant replace nuclear by themselves. The old gen activists didnt really have the capacity to think that far with scientific mind nut unfortunately with emotion.

Yeah. Those idiots were not educated enough to support nuclear over coal so she’s definitely on the right path.

Nuclear is easily the safest, cleanest and most efficient form of energy production. Until we get to nuclear fusion.

As it stands. Nuclear (fission) is the cleanest and safest form of energy available at the moment. When we get to fusion it’ll get even cheaper without even the miniscule amount of (stored)waste fission produces.

Well. Here in northern europe 5th graders are 11 years old. So just about to start puberty and very confused already. I just dont think learning about other than biological gender is of any benefit for so young children. Sexual education in itself is ofcourse important.

Biological gender yes. But for such young children I think its more confusing than helpful to talk about a gender that is freely chosen by an adult on themselves.

Do you have anything other than an opinion on this? Why is he wrong?

Oh he makes awesome videos! My counter recommendation would be ”Inheritance Machining”. Dude creates quite a lot of quality content and really seems to enjoy precise machining. :)

Is he wrong? Women get less views and draw in less money at the moment. Men do play in higher level by nature in this sport so its understandable that the open category (dominated by men) is more entertaining.

I wouldnt watch neither since Fifa is evil and soccer is boring but I still cant figure out the inequality in pay. Just seems fair to me.

How is this inequality? The more valuable players get more oay since they bring more revenue. Sex has nothing to do with it. Its not supposed to be a charity. I think it is fair that payment correlates with ones value regardless of sex or any other attribute. Is it not like that at the moment?

Well. This is truly an unpopular opinion. I do care about well made videos and most of the content I watch on youtube could not be conveyed in a form of text and pictures. I do also appreciate the videography, quality of video production. I pay for youtube gladly for the many hours of content I view monthly.

I mostly watch videos of people creating physical things like furniture, cars, jewelry etc. I find most of the videos insightful, creative, informative and fun but not sexy. I guess its up to the viewer to train the algorithm to find the value on the platform.

1200€ maksoin Espoossa valokuidun kaivamisesta paritaloon. Paras ostos minkä olen tähän taloon tehnyt.