I’m aware of that case, and if you read the language of the bill it doesn’t address that situation very well.

That case is a weird one because I actually think both sides, the student and the graduate assistant grader, were wrong. And ultimately I think the GA was more wrong because the GA held the position of authority in the situation. I generally think that those in authority should be held to more strict standards.

In that specific case that you, there was a very clear scoring rubric published that the GA was supposed to follow. (You can find the rubric published online.) There is no possible way a rational person could read the grading rubric and conclude the student deserved a 0. Yes, it was a very stupidly written essay, but it wasn’t a zero -not if you follow the published rubric. The student was given a zero only because of religious discrimination. The grader should have followed the rubric. If the grader has followed the rubric then the student still would have likely failed the assignment, but the grader would have been able to justify the grade and would probably have avoided getting disciplined.

That’s my position on that. I’m sure you disagree and believe the student was 100% at fault.

France is all “uh… Alright. Uh… Y’all were kinda busy preparing for war with the US.”

Blame the victim.

Food storage is like the whole point of agriculture.

I think you should also include the Iraq War. Evangelicals set a lot of their identity in their belief that the War on Terror would be the final Holy War that would bring about the Kingdom of Christ (with them at the top, of course). But instead their holy war turned into an undeniable catastrophe in front of their eyes.

And also Jesus didn’t come back like he was supposed to.

A black man was elected president.

Actually if you really read the bill most of the additions are concerning protecting political speech, not religious speech (which was already protected).

So if it’s anything more than a political social media bait, then it’s about ensuring conservative kids can praise Trump, not God. (But really, it’s just bait that you guys are happy to swallow.)

deleted by creator

That is not remotely what the bill says. It just say that a school can’t fail a kid because of their religion or politics. The kid still has to do the academic work.

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/835

(3)(a) A student may express his or her religious,58 political, or ideological beliefs in coursework, artwork, and other written and oral assignments free from discrimination oracademic penalty. A student’s homework and classroom assignments shall be evaluated, regardless of their religious, political, or ideological content, based on expected academic standards relating to the course curriculum and requirements. A student may not be penalized or rewarded based on the religious, political, or ideological content of his or her work if the coursework, artwork, or other written or oral assignments require a student’s viewpoint to be expresse

I really wonder if Trump actually thinks that the Navy can just put coal in their air craft carrier engines…

I guess my question is more about what constitutes a “truck suv”. There is no way that SUV built on a truck frame out number SUVs built on car unibody frames by that much.

Hell with that.

Home the Emperor responsible. He should have invested in the necessary institutions during the fat times to prepare downturns.

Damn straight he lost the Mandate of Heaven and the people should hold him appropriately accountable.

How are they breaking out car SUVs vs truck SUVs?

The only thing you can trust about liars is that they are lying.

I meant the El Paso county DA.

… But also her too.

Of course parents also have a responsibly to keep their children safe. But it can’t ONLY be on the parents. The platforms need accountability too.

Do I admit that I came here to shill for child safety policies?

Guilty as charged.

Where is the DA?! You have an autopsy report that says he was murdered. Charge people! That’s your job!

I don’t care.

If I can get some people on this site to start thinking about child safety in new ways that will be a win for me today.

The only real solution is for the parents/guardians to be engaged and involved in their childrens’ lives.

I don’t agree with that. It’s not all on the parents. It can’t be all on the parents.

This is like if the Boy Scouts said “Hey, it’s not our responsibility to protect kids. The parents should have been more involved.” No, if you are providing the service then it’s your responsibility to make sure that service is safe.

And yes, I believe you should be held accountable for the services you provide.