• neo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This game is hardly the only one being discounted heavily and early on in it’s life cycle, it’s just the most egregious example that I’m aware of.

        • neo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Star Wars Jedi: Survivor 55% off right now (Steam)

          Street Fighter 6 44% off right now (Fanatical)

          Starfield 33% off right now (40%, microsoft store, Feb 8 2024)

          Fairing a little bit better than the above:

          Resident Evil 4 Remake 25% off right now (Steam)

          Persona 3 Reload 15% off right now GameBillet

          Baldur’s Gate 3 10% off historically (10%, gog, Dec 21 2023)

          These are just the ones I’m familiar with off the top of my head. Of them, only Baldur’s Gate 3’s discount levels are what I would call “healthy”. 10% for Christmas and no discount since means it’s doing well.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            None of those games are that recent.

            Discounts over time are a perfectly standard part of their pricing strategy. It’s not even mildly unhealthy. Resellers don’t count at all, because that’s always their strategy.

            The unusual part of suicide squad and skull and bones is that they’re brand new games. The discounts are not huge because there’s a problem with the market. They’re huge because they’re dogshit excuses for products and nobody is stupid enough to buy them.

              • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                3 months is recent.

                A game having a significant sale 6 months or a year later is perfectly normal behavior. It tells you absolutely nothing about the industry. It’s worked that way for decades. It’s not the tiniest bit unusual.

          • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I’d say anything under 30% is simply a reflection of how high the profit margins are for sellers. Seeing as 30% is the industry fee tacked onto titles by storefronts.

            Star Wars, Starfield (Not a good game at all), Resi, and Persona are all ‘free’ on GamePass. So they’ve most likely already made their expected profit from sales if going that route was the more profitable decision. That really just leaves SF6, which these days isn’t that strong a franchise and fighting games are niche.

            Videogames are the largest entertainment industry in the world, dwarfing books, film, and music. The industry is seeing record profits year-on-year. Add to that gaming being one of the most resilient entertainment forms during economic downturns due to its price-to-hour ratio, I don’t see these discounts being a reflection of market difficulties.

            • neo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Didn’t DLC and MTX come about because consumers wouldn’t accept a rise in sticker price for games?

              I’m not saying you’re wrong, either, you may very well have a point. I’m just having a hard time reconciling “We added DLC in order to make more money since we can’t raise the sticker price” with “30% discounts are a reflection of how high the profit margins are for sellers”

              • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                They came out because the rise of the Internet made it possible and companies found new ways to make more money.

                Horse armour wasn’t about recouping costs.

        • imecth@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Diablo 4 got 40% off within a few months I find AAA games are increasingly starting with a high price point to capitalize on the hype and advertising campaign, and once that peters out they quickly reduce the price.

          • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Wasn’t Diablo 4 kinda trash as well? Just looking on steam and it’s rated mixed, with people complaining about the monetisation of the game.

            It’s a shame what Blizzard has become, because they used to make amazing games.

            • candid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              It is trash, and Last Epoch launched at half the price being twice as good if not more this year, and with an offline mode. Diablo 4 was my biggest disappointment last year. Blizzard is a husk of its former self, amazing how mask off greedy they have become.

        • Throwaway@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Anthem? Immortals of Avuem? Starfield? Forspoken? Pretty much every bad game discounts early, because word of mouth spreads, independent reviewers review, amd sales plummet. Even Starfield had a 25% discount about a month after release once people realized the magic was missing.