• Spazz@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Stop it.

    Stop pretending this is anything other than an attack on workers, there’s no excuse

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      What do you think happens when a city opts to make a really shitty heat policy because “fuck em”, then a company works someone to death in the heat and their family has issues even suing or getting much from the company because instead of “our company policy on weather was garbage and not good enough” it’s a case of “we were following the cities safety protocols”.

      The state needs to make a good policy for it. Not let dozens of different ones, or choosing to not have one at all, happen.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The state needs to make a good policy for it

        Great! But are they?

        In true ex-Reddit fashion I didn’t read the article, but what I see here is only preventing locales from creating their own worker safety rules. If this is a two-parter establishing consistent rules across the state, people would be all for it. However it’s not. It’s only negative. It’s only consolidation of power without implementing that good policy. It’s only preventing other layers of government from improving worker safety