• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I believe Nebula pays fantastically well, at least according to Sam from Wendover Productions. This is attributed to the fact that Nebula charges a subscription and half the subscription fees are divvied up to the channels according to watch time.

    However, he owns a significant portion of Nebula so he’s not a disinterested information source.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nebula was also made by content creators in response to how bad YouTube is for them.

    • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      My annual subscription to Nebula expired last month. I didn’t renew. They seemed to have a mix of exactly what you get on YouTube and some peculiar TV documentaries that weren’t quite good enough to make brand name TV channels

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think that from a purely “rational consumer” perspective Nebula is worth the $30 per year demanded. But to me, it’s like a Patreon subscription. I can support my favourite creators and I get some nice perks in return, like offline video downloads and advertising and sponsor-free programming. These perks are not worth $30 a year to me. But I will continue to support them anyway.