FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 months agoPerspective rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1769arrow-down10
arrow-up1769arrow-down1imagePerspective rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneFakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarewellee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoWouldn’t that make more sense? Eagles wouldn’t talk to mice, they’d eat them. I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
minus-squareDuranie@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·8 months agoLet’s reframe this a moment - Wealthy person 1 “you ever go hungry?” Wealthy person 2 “no, not at all” Wealthy person 1 “I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about.”
minus-squarewellee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoInteresting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.
Wouldn’t that make more sense? Eagles wouldn’t talk to mice, they’d eat them.
I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
Let’s reframe this a moment -
Wealthy person 1 “you ever go hungry?”
Wealthy person 2 “no, not at all”
Wealthy person 1 “I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about.”
Interesting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.