• Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pets tend to destroy a lot of stuff, intentionally or not. If you are renting out an apartment and would have to replace the sofa because a tennant’s cat doesn’t have a scratching post, versus renting out to someone who doesn’t have a cat and that problem vanishes. Pee on the floorboards can get into them and bloat (i.e. pet misses the litterbox, just wants attention or got sick). You can’t control these accidents, unless you put them in diapers, which nobody obviously does.

      • Crowfiend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        The deposit only covers so much; for example if the deposit is $1000 in damages, but what if the animals end up causing $2000? Then you only pay $1000 when the overall damage is assessed.

        • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Literally no difference.

          In my country and probably most of Europe this would be very illegal.

          Animals can’t even be denied in a rental here, unless the place is too small for them to live comfortably.

          • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Oh man, it’s even more common for places just to not allow pets here. Having dogs as a renter can be very difficult.