smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up1814arrow-down110cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1804arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square96fedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoWe cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-28 months agoThere are now three competing standards. https://xkcd.com/927/
minus-squarebaropithecus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·8 months agoI know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
minus-squareThunderbird4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-28 months agoI’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
There are now three competing standards.
https://xkcd.com/927/
I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
Oh? Let me CEC on that…
I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…