• sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Viruses had only been discovered a few decades before this picture was taken. It’s very likely that the family (and most of society) had no understanding that the virus was unlikely to jump species and so took the same precaution to keep the cat from spreading the disease that they themselves took. I’d rather people made this sort of mistake than the willful idiots we had this time around refusing to believe in viruses at all.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I understand why everyone sees a mask, but I don’t think it is one either. You can see too much detail on the nose, I wouldn’t expect to see that much unless it was a very sheer fabric used for the mask.

        • WanakaTree@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ah you’re right. Make more sense, I was thinking how the FUCK did they get a mask on that cat??

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Did you check whether cats can be an animal reservoir for influenza before posting this?

      • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I knew dogs could carry Covid. Just looked it up and cats can carry the flu. Not sure why this poster felt it was necessary to say this about the family when it’s actually incorrect.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      … willful idiots we had this time …

      Oh, there were plenty of those in 1918, too.