• invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Would love to see more development in this field, but it’s clear that you don’t need to have complex or biologically accurate systems to manipulate other humans. This fact alone means that machine learning models will never be advanced beyond that basic goal under capitalism.

    They’ve been used for economic modeling and stock forecasting for decades now, since the 80s, and the modern implementations of these systems is nothing more than the application of those failed financial modeling systems on human social interactions. Something that wasn’t possible before because until the widespread adoption of the internet, there just wasn’t enough digital communication data to feed into them.

    Since these systems are not capable of self development that isn’t a negative feedback loop, they literally can’t improve without more and more data from different human activity being fed to them.

    That alone shows that they aren’t a new form of intelligence, but instead a titular interface for the same type of information you used to be able to get with “dumb” indexing engines.

    There’s a reason that search engine companies are the primary adopters of this technology, and it’s because they already have been using it for 20+ years in some form, and they have access finally to enough indexed information to make them appear intelligent.