• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    That is only true in the undemocratic 2 party system of the US.

    In places where they actually have multiple parties, say 10 or so at least. It is hard to not find a party that you like more than the others.

    So if someone doesn’t vote, it means none of the parties are good enough. Otherwise they would vote blank. And if too many people do not vote, it sends a clear signal to the government that they need to change something fast in order to prevent an uprising.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That is only true in the undemocratic 2 party system of the US.

      I think that’s pretty clearly who this post was targeted at.

    • mateoinc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There it’s indistinguishable from being uninterested in politics. And politicians have no incentives to cater to those that seem unlikely to vote. Null and blank votes are better at showing disaproval of the system, and at making politicians rethink their strategies

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I was gonna mention this: You don’t have to vote for anyone, and you can just lie after you leave the ballot blank.

    • wildcherry@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, coming from one of those places, I do not want to vote either. The socialists party is crony as shit with multiple corruptions affair, and the only other options are the liberals. Guess I’ll vote far-left, but I don’t really like them either for they are statists.