Deleted

  • 21trillionsats
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one has solved a way to make hosting massive amounts of videos cheap, and this is unlikely to happen anytime soon due to the large amount of data storage and bandwidth required.

    So no, even if YouTube somehow becomes even more tyrannical than it is it’s unlikely we’ll ever see it decentralized and federated the way Lemmy is in a usable way anytime soon.

    • blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Has anybody done the math? How much would each YouTube user have to pay each month to pay for hosting those videos?

      If we want an Internet that doesn’t suck, we need to get over the idea that everything has to be free (as in beer).

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Neither is Digg. Or myspace. Or many of dozens of services that used to be popular and fell into irrelevance.

      • cwagner@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy is irrelevant compared to Reddit. Completely and utterly. There’s what, a single medium-sized subreddit over all instances here?

            • fear@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And they were implied in my own, but I’m happy to extend my statement for you: Being in its infancy doesn’t make it irrelevant compared to Reddit. In fact, that line of thinking from Reddit’s leadership will lead them to obscurity more quickly than if they take this seriously. Just existing as a viable alternative is a big deal. We haven’t had one for a very long time.

        • RedditTransfer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @thiccdiccnicc Digg, myspace and heck ebaumsworld were all places that eventually started dying at some point. I just deleted my 3rd party app for Reddit to prevent my autopilot from clicking on the icon. If someone like me is done with Reddit, I imagine there’s many that feel the same way. In fact, even if spez stepped down, I don’t think I’d return to a centralized platform anymore.

          @IsThisLemmyOpen @pasci_lei @jmcs

  • patryk@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    YouTube won’t die anytime soon because running a Video Streaming Platform is way too expensive if you’re not a big company. So there’s no good alternatives. PeerTube Instances couldn’t handle the massive data that YouTube can

    • PtitSerpent@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      because running a Video Streaming Platform is way too expensive

      Youtube CAN die, even without an alternative. But I understood what you meant

  • RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can anyone eli5 why pornhub doesn’t just use their long standing streaming infrastructure to create a sfw site like… Idk “VidHub”? I feel like they could be a genuine competition with very little adjustment.

    • anthoniix@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Youtube is waaaay different from pornhub. The amount of people uploading porn doesnt even begin to approach the amount of people uploading sfw content.

      You can feasibly make people pay for porn, especially if you get a hot girl to advertise the content to lonely men.

      SFW content though? How do you convince someone to pay for a gaming VOD, or some other type of mundane content? Hosting sfw video is just not profitable on the scale that youtube does it. Not without the backing of some SERIOUS money 😬

  • simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think anything will ever replace YouTube. Did you ever wonder why there aren’t many good alternatives?

    It’s because video streaming websites are very expensive and usually run at a loss. The storage and bandwidth to support all these users constantly uploading and watching videos is really high. It’s why the Twitch competitor Mixer shut down a few years ago, it was bleeding money.

    I use an adblocker and hate ads as much as the next person but imo prople do take these video services for granted. They need ads to survive and I can’t imagine a world where I’d need to pay a subscription to use them.

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never, the big name content creators will never boycott YouTube like Reddit mods for large subs did because YouTube pays them and no one takes alternatives seriously enough to even just mirror their content on an alternative. I’ve been trying to support YouTube alternatives as much as I can but I’m only one person, I’d be naive to think that I alone could make a difference.

    • asjmcguire@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but how long that will remain the case after the mods lose access to their 3rd party tools - will be what dictates it’s future

  • missingno@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Youtube is far too expensive for anyone to try and run a competitor to. I don’t think we’ll ever see a replacement.

    Google is still losing money on it, and might never make it profitable. There’s a real risk that Youtube just dies on its own and nothing replaces it.

  • Vuipes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will be very hard to replace YouTube. Google barely making money from it, if any. The storage you need to host so many videos (some 4k) for free is insane.

  • Gamers_Mate@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe when technology gets to a certain point all that data storage will be a lot cheaper. Atm the best alternative I have seen is Dailymotion but they are nowhere near the scale of youtube.

    • avapa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes! The amount of storage YouTube requires is absolutely bonkers and there’s simply no way to finance that unless you’re backed by a trillion dollar company, unfortunately. AFAIK YouTube still operates on a loss

  • gapbetweenus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sooner as someone figuring out a way for cheaper video hosting. I don’t think youtube is even profitable.

  • Sens@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Peer Tube could take off by us uploading to it and linking it from Lemmy

    • exohuman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only problem is YouTube has a way to monetize their videos, attracting creators who work to make money on the content. PeerTube doesn’t have that yet.

      • UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Handling ads and payments is a whole other issue that federated platforms haven’t even begun to tackle yet. Crypto might be a way forward but it’s messy enough that it might turn some people off.

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Something like Patreon should work just as well with peertube if it’s otherwise suitable, right?