Comparison left vs right for a craftsman who doesnt know which one he should buy:

  • l/r same bed size

  • r lower bed for way easier loading/unloading

  • r less likely to crash

  • r less fuel consumption and costs

  • r less expensive to repair

  • r easy to park

  • r easy to get around in narrow places like crowded construction sites or towns

  • r not participating in road arms race

  • l You get taken serious by your fellow carbrained americans because ““trucks”” are normalized and small handy cars are ridiculed.

So unless you are a fragile piece of human, choose the right one.

  • TraceLines@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How does each hold up in a collision tho? Crumple zones take up space, not something terribly present in the kei truck.

    Not that this makes the 2500’s faults or anything. It just seems worth noticing.

        • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This absolutely inhumane attitude is why we’re dealing with people’s monster trucks killing people on the road and greenhouse gas killing people the drivers haven’t even met.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Especially considering a lot of collision deaths are pedestrians. Better to kill the pedestrain and get away with an accident than injure the pedestrian with the kei truck and end up getting sued.

            “FORD F15-THOUSAND, GUARANTEED TO KILL PEDESTRIANS ON THE FIRST IMPACT OR YOUR MONEY BACK”

    • Krtek@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh definitely, helps if every third car or so is like the one on the right. Would be nice if the government subsidised the right ones and not the ones on the left

      • TraceLines@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except that the studies don’t suggest that. In other parts of the thread, the risk to life and injury works out to be roughly the same for the average collision.

        Unless your commentary is: “Less seating means less people involved.” In which case: Good job, hard to counter.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      So basically, “fuck other people! I care about my own safety and that’s it!”
      Lovely sentiment, no wonder the US is doing so great.

      • TraceLines@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, it was a simple question about the overall efficacy of surviving a crash.

        And if you had participated in other parts of the conversation, you’d see that there is actually movement on that front. TL;DR, since you seem in a hurry, both trucks are equally safe at a speed that most collisions happen ( under 40mph ).

        But if you want to make that about “AMERICANS ARE EVIL”, I can’t really stop you. <3

        • UlfKirsten@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not gonna say Americans are evil, but an astounding percentage lacks critical thinking skills of the most basic variety.

          Which, unfortunately, isn’t only an American problem.

      • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait… Do you not care about your own safety? When all other factors are equal, you’d prefer to just be dead?

    • eldoom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, this is America. I hate being the murica guy but… Other countries have these windey roads that go around mountains because they’re seen as obstacles or they just don’t have mountain ranges to deal with. Here in America we see a mountain and we see it as a challenge. We build roads directly and straight through the most convenient straight line to the next city.

      Now me as a Seattle person I look at the vehicle on the right and I see a great around the town LIGHT hauling truck that would be very useful within those confines.

      If I want to go beyond that like say taking the family to Idaho/Silver Lake or even Sun Lakes I’m screwed. Going up the pass with that I’d be surprised if I broke 50mph with that, the speed limit is 70. Not sure where I’d put my family during that drive tbh but let’s pretend they don’t exist… Now I’m up in the pass while going 20 under the speed limit without dieing… What if there’s snow? There’s snow for half of the year. I’m straight up screwed in that car in the right.