• EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re right, but X-Men can be a metaphor for any oppressed people vs a society that oppresses them. It’s almost as if there is some fundamental oppressor/oppressed dynamic that is universal across history and manifests in different but recognizable ways.

    • Deadend [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wrong. X-men is about Judaism and Israel.

      It was gay since 1981 at the latest with Mystique and Destiny. Going back further. But the civil rights stuff also was not there at the start, mutants was just an easy origin for Stan and Jack.

      X-men have been “woke” since 1975 when the team got very international (Soviet, anfrican, Irish, Canadian, Japanese, west German, Native American) after being gone since 1970.

      Magneto being a Holocaust survivor came later. Xavier was a Korean War vet who was late 20s during the initial run, Magneto wasn’t much older.

      A lot of the Claremont stuff is also very much about his mixed feelings regarding Israel.

      Genosha is an idealized version of Israel’s narrative - where there were people there, but they were bad to mutants, mutants won and made a mutant nation.

      Krakoa is the dream version of Israel as it’s an island that wasn’t inhabited and invited them, the whole second language and mutant names being real, it’s very inspired by Israel. The difference again is that it’s not a colony on other people’s space.

      • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guess he could be backfilling but Stan has been pretty explicit that he intended the civil rights metaphor from the start. Obviously a lot of the best stuff didnt come till Claremont, but it was still there. Just like, without Magneto being more morally interesting and stuff.

        I do agree about the applicability to Judiasm, though I didnt know that Claremont was explicitly working with mixed feelings on Israel.