When Al-Qaeda themselves claimed responsibility, even with overwhelming evidence aside? Why were so many people still reluctant, I was researching about this stuff and was shocked to see people who I respect a lot believe in this

  • phillaholic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s a first for everything. And after reading the report, it’s easy to come to the conclusion that a building under those conditions would be expected to fail.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      like a first for govenment coverup of a building demolition disguised as a terror attack?

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Could have been, but it wasn’t. It’s utterly absurd to think it was logistically possible to do so without anyone seeing or leaking anything. That plot wouldn’t make it out of 9th grade creative writing class.