Mmmmm…if it were used that way, but people don’t tend to these days. So you’d essentially be doubling the amount of FU buttons. I could easily see someone arguing a heated political point, only to be told everything they said is irrelevant.

Also concerned about the allocation of other elements, here. The rain may short my device, but if I stay in the sun, there are no trees and I shall bake

The question I would like to see on top of that is: would my action contribute to a single, mono thematic and normatif point of view or promote the emergence of other discourse and discussion even tho I don’t agree with them at the first glance?

Would you only have one choice of the four directions, or one choice in each pathway?