• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It could also speed research up. It is incredibly unlikely that the current amount of money spent is exactly the best amount possible.

    And even if research were to somehow slow down compared to now, the world would still be a better place, since fewer rich assholes would have undue influence.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do you even understand what I’m saying?

      The world isn’t a better place if research slows down because they charge you $7100 but it’s $650 elsewhere.

      Lower the god damn prices.

      Bam there’s fewer rich assholes now and millions of individuals are better off.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Do you understand what I’m saying? Don’t just lower prices, also increase investments in R&D. We are not at peak R&D efficiency, so don’t ignore it completely.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If they truly believed they could spend more money and get more out of it, they would be, because that would give them billions more in bonuses.

          These multi billion dollar companies run efficiently until they don’t because they expanded too much too fast and the bureaucracy and size becomes the problem.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Why do you think that they can get more money with more efficient R&D? Sometimes less efficient solutions result in more money.